1985
DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(10)60348-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of Mediastinoscopy in Pretreatment Staging of Patients with Primary Lung Cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
72
1
4

Year Published

1989
1989
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 181 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
72
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…These studies describe metastatic lymph nodes to be present at the time of surgery in 15-20% of CT-negative patients [4][5][6].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These studies describe metastatic lymph nodes to be present at the time of surgery in 15-20% of CT-negative patients [4][5][6].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inferior mediastinum may be evaluated by thoracoscopy. However, all these more aggressive staging procedures require general anaesthesia, surgical incision, and, therefore, are associated with considerable costs [5,6]. Positron emission tomography (PET) was expected to increase the accuracy of mediastinal staging in nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and indeed, a meta-analysis has confirmed its superiority [7].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While a standard cervical mediastinoscopy permits access to paratracheal lymph node stations (levels 2 right (R), 2 left (L), 3, 4R and 4L) and usually the anterior subcarinal lymph node station (level 7), access to the posterior and inferior mediastinum is limited and requires either extended cervical mediastinoscopy or a thoracoscopy. Furthermore, the sensitivity for mediastinoscopy is still only 80-90%, and, in 10-15% of cases, the technique returns a false-negative diagnosis [2,3]. Failure to identify mediastinal disease pre-operatively contributes to tumour relapse rates, despite apparently successful resection.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13,14) It can only sample nodal stations 1-4 and 7, cannot access hilar nodal stations and has a morbidity of 1% and mortality of 0.05% which increases with inexperienced hands. 4,15) In contrast, the EBUS-TBNA procedure is safe and minimally invasive, and does not require general anesthesia or hospitalization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%