Role of Macronutrients in Cotton Production

Ahmed, Niaz; Ali, Muhammad Arif; Danish, Subhan; Chaudhry, Usman Khalid; Hussain, Sajjad; Hassan, Waseem; Ahmad, Fiaz; Ali, Nawab

doi:10.1007/978-981-15-1472-2_6

Cited by 8 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 120 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Different nitrogen application rates were found to be positively influence the dry matter production in cotton [18]. Boron application also resulted in more DMP because of its role in influencing other nutrient uptake and enhancing the physiological processes [19]. Similar pattern of results were obtained [20,21] and concluded that micronutrient application does have effect on dry matter production of crops.…”

Section: Fig 2 Influence Of Nutrients and Plant Growth Regulators On ...supporting

confidence: 62%

Physiological Role of Nutrient Consortium for Improving the Yield in Cotton

Jenifer,

Sritharan,

Senthil

et al. 2023

IJPSS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The present investigation was carried out to study the impact of nutrients and PGRs (Plant Growth Regulators) on morphological, physiological and yield attributes of the cotton crop. The statistical design used for the study was Factorial Completely Randomized Design (FCRD) with four replications. The pot culture experiment was conducted in the Glass house, Department of Crop Physiology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University (TNAU) during February 2023 – June 2023. The study was carried out using two cotton varieties (CO 17 and MCU 5) with the treatments containing 1% foliar spray of Nutrio-hormonal consortia Ⅰ, Nutrio-hormonal consortia Ⅱ, Cotton Booster Ⅰ, Cotton Booster Ⅱ and control. The treatments were imposed during flowering and boll development stages. The morphological, physiological and yield attributes viz., plant height (in cm), chlorophyll index, total dry matter production (g/plant), number of sympodial branches per plant, number of bolls per plant, boll weight (g/boll) and seed cotton yield (g/plant) were recorded. Foliar application of the Cotton booster Ⅱ resulted in significant increase in the plant height (58.35 cm), total dry matter production (38.65 g/plant), number of sympodial branches per plant (17.8), number of bolls per plant (15.60), boll weight (3.88 g/boll) and seed cotton yield (42.79 g/plant) followed by Cotton booster Ⅰ in CO 17 variety. Similarly, in MCU 5 cotton variety, significant difference was observed in plant height (69.37 cm), total dry matter production (45.60 g/plant), number of sympodial branches per plant (19.6), number of bolls per plant (20.0), boll weight(4.39 g/boll) and seed cotton yield (48.77 g/plant). In conclusion, foliar application of 1% Cotton Booster Ⅱ exhibited better growth and yield attributes in cotton.

show abstract

Section: Fig 2 Influence Of Nutrients and Plant Growth Regulators On ...supporting

confidence: 62%

Physiological Role of Nutrient Consortium for Improving the Yield in Cotton

Jenifer,

Sritharan,

Senthil

et al. 2023

IJPSS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Carinata and winter wheat differ in nutrient concentrations which may affect subsequent row crop production. Carinata residue has been noted to contain high proportions of K and Ca (Seepaul et al, 2019), with K being essential to boll development and fill (Hu et al, 2016) and Ca aiding in uptake of other macronutrients (such as K) and increasing plant structural support that allows for taller plants with more nodes for sympodia formation (Ahmed et al, 2020). This was potentially a contributing factor to the greater cotton yields observed compared to the wheat treatment (Figures 2 and 3), as greater access to soil K would increase lint yields by improving boll size, fill, and set as noted by Read et al (2006).…”

Section: Cover Crops Effects On Cotton Yields and Yield Componentsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Cover cropping history affects cotton boll distribution, lint yields, and fiber quality

Billman¹,

Campbell²

2023

Crop Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

There has been limited introduction of new cover crop species into cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) production within the last 30 years. Mounting evidence shows that traditional cover cropping species may be detrimental to cotton production, either by depleting soil fertility with crop removal, immobilizing minerals from high carbon residue, or excessive quantity of residue remaining at planting. The objective of this study was to determine the effects of growing a novel cover crop species, carinata (Brassica carinata A. Braun), as a winter annual cover crop for cotton rotation in the southeastern Coastal Plain. Over a 2‐year period, carinata, winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), and fallow covers were maintained over winter months, then rotated into cotton. Each year, seedcotton and lint yields were collected, along with subsamples for ginning and subsequent fiber quality analyses. Additionally, end‐of‐season plant mapping was conducted on plants from 1 m of row per plot to determine cover crop effects on boll formation, retention, and distribution, as well as canopy architecture. Results indicated that seedcotton and lint yield of cotton following carinata was greater than cotton following winter wheat, and lint yields of cotton following wheat were lower than cotton after fallow. Fiber quality was largely unaffected by preceding cover crop. End‐of‐season plant mapping indicated that cotton grown after carinata had more position 2 bolls, which correlated to greater lint yields. These results indicate that carinata can potentially serve as a new, more effective cover crop than winter wheat for cotton rotations in Coastal Plain soils.

show abstract

“…For instance, N, phosphorus (P), and potassium (K) are required in large quantities and are limited in many soils. The deficiencies of macronutrients and micronutrients decrease cotton yield (Ahmed N. et al, 2020). Recently, Iqbal et al (2022) demonstrated that low P tolerance in cotton is regulated by root morphology and physiology.…”

Section: Proteomics: For Improving Cotton Fiber Qualitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Cotton proteomics: Dissecting the stress response mechanisms in cotton

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The natural environment of plants comprises a complex set of biotic and abiotic stresses, and plant responses to these stresses are complex as well. Plant proteomics approaches have significantly revealed dynamic changes in plant proteome responses to stress and developmental processes. Thus, we reviewed the recent advances in cotton proteomics research under changing environmental conditions, considering the progress and challenging factors. Finally, we highlight how single-cell proteomics is revolutionizing plant research at the proteomics level. We envision that future cotton proteomics research at the single-cell level will provide a more complete understanding of cotton’s response to stresses.

show abstract

Role of Macronutrients in Cotton Production

Cited by 8 publications

References 120 publications

Physiological Role of Nutrient Consortium for Improving the Yield in Cotton

Physiological Role of Nutrient Consortium for Improving the Yield in Cotton

Cover cropping history affects cotton boll distribution, lint yields, and fiber quality

Cotton proteomics: Dissecting the stress response mechanisms in cotton

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About