2018
DOI: 10.21608/ajnsa.2018.12717
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of Loss Mechanisms in the Breakdown of Argon Irradiated with IR Laser Radiation

Abstract: Threshold intensity measurements of the breakdown of argon are numerically analyzed. The breakdown is induced by a Nd: YAG laser radiation at wavelength of 1064 nm and pulse duration of 8.5 ns.The investigation considered argon over pressure range extended from 25 torr-760 torr.The measured threshold intensity corresponding to this pressure range is found to vary between 5.4xl0 11 W/cm 2 and 1.1xl0 11 W/cm 2. These are the experimental conditions given by Davis et al. [1]. The analysis considers an electron ca… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
(20 reference statements)
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on these considerations, we can conclude that the laser significant-intensity-threshold falls in the energy range of 3-4 J (corresponding to a peak intensity 5-6.7 × 10 11 W/cm 2 ) for a N-gas at the backing pressure of 64 bar (6 × 10 19 atoms/cm 3 neutral density) and 0.9-1.5 J (corresponding to 1.4-2.7 × 10 11 W/cm 2 ) for an Ar-gas at the backing pressure of 51.2 bar (5 × 10 19 cm 3 atomic density). Such estimations are in agreement with similar estimations present in literature [22,23].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 94%
“…Based on these considerations, we can conclude that the laser significant-intensity-threshold falls in the energy range of 3-4 J (corresponding to a peak intensity 5-6.7 × 10 11 W/cm 2 ) for a N-gas at the backing pressure of 64 bar (6 × 10 19 atoms/cm 3 neutral density) and 0.9-1.5 J (corresponding to 1.4-2.7 × 10 11 W/cm 2 ) for an Ar-gas at the backing pressure of 51.2 bar (5 × 10 19 cm 3 atomic density). Such estimations are in agreement with similar estimations present in literature [22,23].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 94%