Role of integration-segmentation on work-family interface of insurance sector employees in India

Abstract

Purpose Researchers have used different approaches to understand how individuals combine work with family, one being boundary and transition management. However, very few studies have focussed on empirically examining the role of individual boundary management style on work-family experience. The purpose of this paper is to fill this gap by examining the role of integration-segmentation on work-family conflict (WFC) and work-family enrichment (WFE). Two secondary purposes are to explore gender differences in work-family experiences and to examine the relationship between WFC and WFE. Design/methodology/approach The predictor variable in the primary study is integration (with two levels segmented and integrated). Different measures of WFC and WFE are criterion variables. Survey method was used to collect data from 156 life insurance professionals including 64 women employees in India. The average age of the sample is 35 years (SD=6.56). Boundary strategy of integration or segmentation between work and family is determined by measuring similarity in resource priority between work and family. Median split technique is used to delineate the groups. Findings The study has three key findings: employees with integrated boundary strategy report greater levels of both WFC and WFE; no gender differences exist in the experience of WFC and WFE; and WFC and WFE were found to be unrelated to each other. Originality/value The paper empirically studies the role of boundaries on WFC and WFE of insurance employees. It is a response to researchers’ call to integrate boundary theory with spillover theory and examine the role of integration-segmentation.

The development and application of a scale to measure the extent and forms of work-family conflict in collectivist cultures

“…Hsu, 2011;Oren and Levin, 2017;Rabenu et al, 2017;Wang et al, 2010). Moreover, while most have employed the Carlson et al's (2000) measure to examine WFC in collectivist culture, they have not attempted to confirm or reject the existence of the bidirectional time, strain, and behaviour forms of WFC (Fiksenbaum et al, 2010;Hassan et al, 2010;Padhi and Pattnaik, 2017;Rabenu et al, 2017;Spector et al, 2007). Studies in both individualistic and collective cultures have noted the absence of significant behavioural WFC (e.g.…”

Work–Study Boundary Congruence, Contextual Supports, and Proactivity in University Students Who Work: A Moderated-Mediation Model

“…Research has shown that boundary congruence between work and nonwork domains is related to better well-being (e.g., LeComte-Hinley, 2013), less conflict (Chen, Powell, & Greenhaus, 2009), more work commitment (Rothbard, Phillips, & Dumas, 2005), and greater capacity to detach psychologically from work (Mellner, 2016). However, there have been calls for additional research, as most studies on boundary congruence have been conducted with adults in the work–family domain (Padhi & Pattnaik, 2017).…”

How the configurations of job autonomy, work–family interference, and demographics boost job satisfaction: an empirical study using fsQCA

“…It provides a different lens to understand how individuals manage the interface between work and family by focusing on the boundary between work and family (Ashforth et al 2000 ). Studies show that the clearer the role boundaries between work and family, the less the conflict between work and family (Padhi and Pattnaik 2017 ). Therefore, while having policy interventions to facilitate work–family balance, employees must be made aware about the consequences of unwarranted use.…”