2009
DOI: 10.1002/nag.818
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of inertia in falling head permeability test

Abstract: SUMMARYThis paper discusses the role of macro-and micro-inertial forces in the falling head permeability test. The model of flow including viscous and dynamic interaction forces is formulated. Then, the model is used to perform numerical simulations of the tests for high-permeability soils. The presented results prove the existence of a level of permeability of materials above which macro-and micro-inertial forces are important and that in all cases the latter forces are dominant. The results suggest limited v… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The interaction force between pore liquid and porous sample (neglecting friction at the sample's wall) according to the well-known nonlinear form (called also Hazen-DupuitDarcy equation) which neglects dynamic interaction (Hassanizadeh and Gray 1987;Zeng and Grigg 2006;Kaczmarek 2009) is…”
Section: Mathematical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interaction force between pore liquid and porous sample (neglecting friction at the sample's wall) according to the well-known nonlinear form (called also Hazen-DupuitDarcy equation) which neglects dynamic interaction (Hassanizadeh and Gray 1987;Zeng and Grigg 2006;Kaczmarek 2009) is…”
Section: Mathematical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common analytic models used to interpret slug tests were developed by Bouwer and Rice (1976), Bredehoeft and Papadopulos (1980), Cooper et al (1965Cooper et al ( , 1967 and Hvorslev (1951). These models, however, usually assume homogeneity of the analyzed water-bearing formations, when many of them are, in fact, characterized by the presence of different systems of void space which may lead to preferential flow (Beckie and Harvey 2002;Copty et al 2011;Pechstein et al 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In higher velocity flows, differently from usual seepage problems, the force exerted by the soil particles on the moving water is not well described by a linear function of the velocity (e.g., ). In order to model such flows, more complex expressions for the interaction force have been proposed as, for instance, the following quite general law , obtained from the traditional linear Darcy force by the addition of a Forchheimer term (quadratic in the velocity) and an added mass term (linear in the acceleration): f=αvβboldvvλa,valid only for incompressible fluids. In the aforementioned equation, f is the interaction force per unit volume, v is the velocity (‖ v ‖ denotes the norm of v ), a is the acceleration, and α , β , and λ are positive constants (only homogeneous soils will be treated here).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to illustrate the magnitude of these numbers in a particular case, consider the following values: r 0 = 0.10 m, Q / D = 10 − 2 m 3 /s/m, n = 0. 3, ρ = 10 3 kg/m 3 , γ = 9.81 × 10 3 N/m 3 , and, for a coarse sand : α = 2 × 10 4 Pa m − 2 s, β = 3 × 10 5 Pa m − 3 s 2 , λ = 2 × 10 3 Pa m − 2 s 2 . In this case: B ∞ ≅ 8.6 × 10 − 3 m, C ∞ ≅ 4.3 × 10 − 4 m, b 0 ≅ 8 × 10 − 1 , c 0 = 8 × 10 − 2 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%