2022
DOI: 10.1007/s13224-022-01729-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of Hysteroscopy in Patients with Previous In Vitro Fertilization Failure: An Institutional Experience in Rural Population

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of these, 46 articles were excluded for various reasons: 25 were non-RCTs, 20 did not meet our inclusion criteria, such as lacking a control group design, including patients with natural pregnancy or including patients undergoing intrauterine insemination, 10 did not report the outcomes of interest, 21 were not in English, and one were inaccessible in full text. Although three articles did not provide data on the primary outcome of live birth rate, they were included in this meta-analysis due to their reporting of other relevant secondary outcomes [ 14 16 ]. Ultimately, 10 RCTs were incorporated into this meta-analysis [ 17 23 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Of these, 46 articles were excluded for various reasons: 25 were non-RCTs, 20 did not meet our inclusion criteria, such as lacking a control group design, including patients with natural pregnancy or including patients undergoing intrauterine insemination, 10 did not report the outcomes of interest, 21 were not in English, and one were inaccessible in full text. Although three articles did not provide data on the primary outcome of live birth rate, they were included in this meta-analysis due to their reporting of other relevant secondary outcomes [ 14 16 ]. Ultimately, 10 RCTs were incorporated into this meta-analysis [ 17 23 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, this study has limitations. The quality of the included RCTs varied, with some being small-scale and having bias concerns, including one study with a high risk of bias [ 14 ]. Sensitivity analyses, excluding the study with high risk, did not alter our results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Значительное влияние на эффективность протоколов ЭКО было выявлено при сравнении группы пациенток после гистероскопии с группой контроля, причем в обеих группах не было выявлено патологических изменений при ультразвуковом исследовании и гистеросальпингографии [9,16]. В новом аналогичном исследовании с обновленными критериями показатель частоты клинических беременностей оказался также выше у пациенток с предварительно проведенной гистероскопией [17].…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Схожие результаты получены в метаанализах за 2019 и 2020 гг., однако сведения о частоте выкидышей и живорождений в этих обзорах противоречат друг другу [18,19]. В рамках ряда работ выявлена статистически значимая связь между повышением вероятности имплантации плодного яйца и формированием клинической беременности с фактом лечебного повреждения эндометрия в рамках программы подготовки к ЭКО [16,17,[21][22][23][24][25]. Проведение же диагностической гистероскопии изолированно, без лечебного повреждения эндометрия, не сказывалось на эффективности протоколов ЭКО [26].…”
Section: Discussionunclassified