2007
DOI: 10.1039/b705129h
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of hydroxyapatite nanoparticle size in bone cell proliferation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

16
280
1
11

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 367 publications
(308 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
16
280
1
11
Order By: Relevance
“…NanoHA possesses a significantly higher surface area, porosity and densification, which may improve its mechanical properties under load, shows solubility in vivo and the capacity to penetrate cell membranes [25]. Also, nanoscale topography have a positive effect on osteoblastic proliferation and differentiation, and the nano-crystals allow a constant regeneration of bone, resulting in improved biocompatibility and osteointegration [26]. Some authors have addressed the capacity of blending nanoHA with antimicrobial agents (e.g., amoxicillin, erythromycin, minocycline, zinc oxid, cobalt) [8,[27][28][29] or materials (e.g., hydroxide, chitosan) [30,31] for the treatment of infections related to biomedical devices and implants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NanoHA possesses a significantly higher surface area, porosity and densification, which may improve its mechanical properties under load, shows solubility in vivo and the capacity to penetrate cell membranes [25]. Also, nanoscale topography have a positive effect on osteoblastic proliferation and differentiation, and the nano-crystals allow a constant regeneration of bone, resulting in improved biocompatibility and osteointegration [26]. Some authors have addressed the capacity of blending nanoHA with antimicrobial agents (e.g., amoxicillin, erythromycin, minocycline, zinc oxid, cobalt) [8,[27][28][29] or materials (e.g., hydroxide, chitosan) [30,31] for the treatment of infections related to biomedical devices and implants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…54 Furthermore, 2Fe-SeHA material had the lowest crystallite size (about 48 nm) ( Table II), suggesting that 2Fe-SeHA nanoparticles might have penetrated into the cell membranes and inhibited the cell growth. 55 To evaluate how hFOB cells responded to different surfaces of Fe-SeHA materials, the morphology of cells on these materials was studied by SEM examinations. The morphology of hFOB cells on Fe-SeHA materials discs after 3 days of incubation can be seen in SEM images Figure 9(a-d).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…54 Another reason would be that cells might have been disturbed due to probable penetration of these nanoparticles into the cells. 55 Tissue nonspecific alkaline phosphatase (ALP) is the natural enzyme produced by osteoblasts cells during osteogenesis. To investigate the early stage of stem cell differentiation, ALP expression and intracellular calcium deposition are considered as an early osteoblastic marker of osteogenic differentiation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the one hand, hydroxyapatite and titania nanoparticles of up to 40 nm diameter decreased osteoblastic cell proliferation and viability, respectively. 99,116 On the other hand, in another study, only hydroxyapatite nanoparticles with a diameter of 20 nm enhanced cell growth of osteoblast-like cells compared with larger particles with a diameter of 80 nm. 117 In addition to particle uptake by osteoblasts and potential effects on proliferation and viability, the consequences of nanoparticle presence on the differentiation and mineralization of osteoblastic cells were assessed in a variety of studies with a wide range of particles.…”
Section: Osteoblastsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…98 MSC proliferation was affected in a sizedependent manner by the exposure of these cells to calcium phosphate nanoparticles, with larger particles being more harmful. 99 The same research group further investigated a potential dependency on particle concentration and their form of appearance. It was observed that with increasing concentration as well as with amorphous particles in contrast to crystalline calcium phosphate particles, osteogenic cell differentiation and matrix mineralization decreased.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%