2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00894-019-4255-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of hydrogen bonding interactions within of the conformational preferences of calix[n = 4,6,8]arene: DFT and QTAIM analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The topological parameters obtained here are consistent with hydrogen bond interactions observed in previous studies [39,40]. The larger hydrogen-bonding interaction energies calculated for 2 E int (BSSE) = −11.782 kcal mol vs. 1 (E int (BSSE) = −11.465 kcal/mol) are also consistent with the shorter intermolecular distances observed in the crystal structures.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The topological parameters obtained here are consistent with hydrogen bond interactions observed in previous studies [39,40]. The larger hydrogen-bonding interaction energies calculated for 2 E int (BSSE) = −11.782 kcal mol vs. 1 (E int (BSSE) = −11.465 kcal/mol) are also consistent with the shorter intermolecular distances observed in the crystal structures.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…As shown in Tables 3 and S1, this BCP also presented QTAIM parameters very similar to those observed for Br•••Br contacts, which indicates a vdW attractive interaction. The topological parameters obtained here are consistent with hydrogen bond interactions observed in previous studies [39,40] The topological parameters obtained here are consistent with hydrogen bond interactions observed in previous studies [39,40] A Br•••Br interaction dimer was investigated for structures 1 (1-BrBr) and 2 (2-CHBrBr). Although no short Br•••Br contacts are present in 2, bond critical points (BCPs) were observed in the theoretical calculations.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The stable structures of the studied systems (CX [4] and CX[4]-gas) have been calculated with the DFT method by using the B3LYP [16,[19][20][21] coupled to the D3BJ (empirical Becke and Johnson damping dispersion corrections) in combination with the 6-31 + G(d) basis set, as implemented in GAUSSIAN 09 package [22] and the Gauss View [23] as a visual program. We have been calculated the binding energies of the CX[4]-gas take into account the Basis Set Superposition Error (BSSE) counterpoise (CP) correction energy of Boys and Bernardi [24].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The optimization of CX [4] and CX [4]-gas have been performed by the Density Functional Theory (DFT) method by using the global hybrid generalized gradient approximation B3LYP [15,18,19,20] coupled to the D3BJ (empirical Becke and Johnson damping dispersion corrections) in combination with the 6-31þG(d) basis set, as implemented in a Gaussian 09 package [21] and the GaussView [22] as a visual program. The binding energies have been calculated taking into account the Basis Set Superposition Error (BSSE) counterpoise correction (CP) according to the formalism of Boys and Bernardi [23].…”
Section: Computational Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%