The article is devoted to the discussion of the high-throughput approach to band structures calculations. We present scientific and computational challenges as well as solutions relying on the developed framework (Automatic Flow, AFLOW/ACONVASP). The key factors of the method are the standardization and the robustness of the procedures. Two scenarios are relevant: 1) independent users generating databases in their own computational systems (off-line approach) and 2) teamed users sharing computational information based on a common ground (on-line approach). Both cases are integrated in the framework: for off-line approaches, the standardization is automatic and fully integrated for the 14 Bravais lattices, the primitive and conventional unit cells, and the coordinates of the high symmetry k-path in the Brillouin zones. For on-line tasks, the framework offers an expandable web interface where the user can prepare and set up calculations following the proposed standard. Few examples of band structures are included. LSDA+U parameters (U, J) are also presented for Nd, Sm, and Eu. Over the past decade computational materials science has undergone a tremendous growth thanks to the availability, power and relatively limited cost of high-performance computational equipment. The highthroughput (HT) method, started from the seminal paper by Xiang et al. for combinatorial discovery of superconductors [1], has become an effective and efficient tool for materials development [2,3,4,5,6] and prediction [7,8,9,10,11,12,13]. Recent examples of computational HT are the Pareto-optimal search for alloys and catalysts [14,15], the data-mining of quantum calculations method leading to the principle-component analysis of the formation energies of many alloys in several configurations [10,11,12,16,17], the highthroughput Kohn-anomalies search in ternary lithiumborides [18,19,20], and the multi-optimization techniques used for the study of high-temperature reactions in multicomponent hydrides [21,22,23].In its practical implementation, HT uses some sort of automatic optimization technique to screen through a library of candidate compounds and to direct further refinements. The library can be a set of alloy prototypes [24,12] or a database of compounds such as the Pauling File [25] or the ICSD Database [26,27]. An important difference between the several-calculations and the HT philosophies is that the former concentrates on the calculation of a particular property, while the latter focuses on the extraction of property correlations which are used to guide the search for systems with ad-hoc characteristics. The power of HT comes with a cost. Due to the enormous amount of information produced, standardization and robustness of the procedures are necessary. This is especially true if one were concomitantly optimizing thermodynamics and electronic structure, which is required, for instance, in catalyst design [28], in accelerated "battery materials" discovery [29], and superconducting materials development [19,20]. Therefore a ratio...