2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2012.12.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of genomic instability in arsenic-induced carcinogenicity. A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
69
1
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 216 publications
1
69
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…4 C and D). Screens for DRC inhibitors or enhancers are expected to identify some agents for which the mechanism of action is unknown; indeed, uncertainty remains as to the precise mechanisms by which arsenic and cadmium exposure lead to reduced DRC (41,52). In view of this uncertainty, the strength of FM-HCR lies in the ability to measure changes in DRC as an important functional endpoint.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 C and D). Screens for DRC inhibitors or enhancers are expected to identify some agents for which the mechanism of action is unknown; indeed, uncertainty remains as to the precise mechanisms by which arsenic and cadmium exposure lead to reduced DRC (41,52). In view of this uncertainty, the strength of FM-HCR lies in the ability to measure changes in DRC as an important functional endpoint.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was well documented that multiple factors, pathways and steps, including the external environment such as virus, parasite and bacterial, internal environment, contributed to the primary hepatic carcinoma (Clark et al, 2015). Generally, genetic factors could only account for 5% of the tumor pathogenesis, whereas the coefficient of external and internal environment showed its influence on most tumors (Bhattacharjee et al, 2013). The internal environment, considered appropriate for the development of carcinoma, are believed to be one of the most pivotal factors in the formation of tumors (Xu et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even moderately elevated concentrations of inorganic arsenic (iAs) in drinking water pose a serious public health problem [2]. Previous epidemiological studies of individuals exposed to high arsenic levels in drinking water suggest that chronic arsenic exposure via drinking water is widely associated with a higher risk of skin lesions, hypertension, diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, and cancer of the skin, lungs, bladder, liver, and possibly kidneys [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. Therefore, the World Health Organization guideline for arsenic in drinking water is 10 μg/L [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%