2000
DOI: 10.1029/gm122p0169
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of fracture geometry in the evolution of flow paths under stress

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
27
1
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
3
27
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, this is not consistent with field and laboratory observations of flow channeling in single fractures [Moreno et al, 1985;Bourke, 1987;Gentier et al, 2000]. On the basis of these observations, flow channeling is mainly explained by a variation of apertures and contact areas within the fracture [Neretnieks et al, 1982;Tsang andTsang, 1987, 1989;Tsang et al, 1988;Moreno et al, 1988Moreno et al, , 1990Tsang and Neretnieks, 1998].…”
Section: Flow Pattern Within a Fracture And Consequences On Hydromechcontrasting
confidence: 40%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nevertheless, this is not consistent with field and laboratory observations of flow channeling in single fractures [Moreno et al, 1985;Bourke, 1987;Gentier et al, 2000]. On the basis of these observations, flow channeling is mainly explained by a variation of apertures and contact areas within the fracture [Neretnieks et al, 1982;Tsang andTsang, 1987, 1989;Tsang et al, 1988;Moreno et al, 1988Moreno et al, , 1990Tsang and Neretnieks, 1998].…”
Section: Flow Pattern Within a Fracture And Consequences On Hydromechcontrasting
confidence: 40%
“…Some models accounting for the effects of contact areas on fracture flow and deformability are proposed from laboratory observations [Yang et al, 1989;Myer, 1991;Pyrak-Nolte and Morris, 2000;Detwiler et al, 2002]. Sibaï et al [1997] and Gentier et al [2000] showed through laboratory hydromechanical experiments that the spatial distribution of contact areas within the fracture varies under normal stress and induces preferential flow paths through localized channels. Recent hydromechanical simulations of flow in a rough deformable fracture confirmed observations of flow channeling, and showed that the distributions of fracture aperture during shearing change and cause significant fluid flow channeling effects [Koyama et al, 2005].…”
Section: Flow Pattern Within a Fracture And Consequences On Hydromechmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hydraulic stimulation consists in injecting water with high flow rate in order to increase the pore pressure within the rock mass which promotes the shearing of existing fractures, a mechanism accompanied partly by detectable induced microseismicity. When the injection is stopped, the shearing relaxation is irreversible and the reactivated fractures do not close totally, yielding to a new and/or enhanced permeability [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depending on the atti tude and intensity of the principal component of the imposed stress, hydraulic properties of the fracture system can change consistently, affecting the per meability of the media (Aydin, 2000;Baghbanan and Jing, 2008;Tondi et al, 2016). This is valid at the scale of microfractures (Gentier et al, 2000;Simpson et al, 2001) and at regional scales (Bell and Babcock, 1986;Mandl and Hark ness, 1987;Storti et al, 1997;Morin and Savage, 2003;Tondi et al, 2016). In re sponse to the direction of the crustal stress field, fractures can be kept open or undergo closure (Gale et al, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%