Role of Foreign and Domestic Institutional Investors in Corporate Sustainability: Focusing on R&D Investment

Abstract

This paper examines the effects of ownership by foreign and domestic institutional investors on corporate sustainability by focusing on the level of research and development (R&D) investment. Long-term investment in R&D is crucial for companies that seek to generate sustainable growth. Ordinary least-squares regression is performed on a sample of Korean listed companies. The main test with both foreign and domestic institutional ownership is based on a study period from 2001 to 2004. The results indicate that firms with higher levels of foreign institutional ownership exhibit greater levels of corporate R&D activities, while the ownership by domestic institutions has no significant influence on firms’ R&D investment. An additional test with foreign institutional ownership data is based on an extended study period from 2001 to 2014, and shows that foreign institutional ownership is positively related to firms’ R&D investment. This result survives the two-stage instrumental variable approach used to address endogeneity factors in foreign institutional ownership. Taken together, these findings suggest that foreign institutions can effectively monitor managerial myopia and promote corporate innovations.

Do Foreign Investors Affect Carbon Emission Disclosure? Evidence from South Korea

“…This paper examines whether foreign investors affect voluntary disclosure by focusing on carbon emissions. Disclosing information on carbon emissions is vital for corporate sustainability that requires a major innovative transformation of the overall business of allocating and managing resources and energy efficiently [ 1 , 2 ]. Along with the innovative efforts, firms’ responsibility for climate change and ecosystem destruction is inevitable for sustainable growth.…”

The impact of the ownership structure on the innovative activity of Russian companies

“…Kong, Zhu, and Yang confirm the same results for China's energy sector and prove that the share of revenues spent for R&D is positively related to foreign ownership; however, unlike in previous paper, the presence of state ownership decreases the positive effect of foreign investors on innovation [Kong, Zhu, Yang, 2020]. Shin and Park analyze this effect by taking into account only institutional investors and find that foreign institutional investors are insignificant in modelling R&D intensity, if domestic institutional investors are included, meaning stand-alone significance only [Shin, Park, 2020]. Institutional investors are typically larger and thus invest in larger firms, seeking lower risk and stable returns, while private investors, such as Venture Capital firms, usually look for risky projects with higher returns.…”

“…A widely used measurement of competition is the Herfindahl index. Greater market competition affects R&D intensity in a positive manner (lower Herfindahl index, bigger concentration of firms in the industry) [Shin, Park, 2020]. There is also evidence that the Herfindahl index in square power should be included in the model to check for a non-linear effect of market competition on innovation activity.…”

Institutional Investors' Monitoring Roles in State Controlled Firms and Income Smoothing Analysis for Stable Growth and Sustainability: Focusing on China Stock Market

“…Ilhang Shin and Sorah Park [40] divided institutional investors into domestic institutional investors and foreign institutional investors according to geographical origin to examine the monitoring incentives of institutional investors. Chwee Ming Tee [13] divided institutional investors according to their geographical position as domicile institutional investors and foreign institutional investors.…”