2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2013.05.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of FDG-PET/CT in evaluating surgical outcomes of operable breast cancer – Usefulness for malignant grade of triple-negative breast cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
28
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
6
28
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Regardless, it was not prognostic for RFS in this study. SUVmax at staging has been prognostic for RFS in patients with operable breast cancer [19][20][21][22][23][24][25]. However, no studies have evaluated the interactions between clinicopathological and metabolic prognostic factors for risk stratification.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regardless, it was not prognostic for RFS in this study. SUVmax at staging has been prognostic for RFS in patients with operable breast cancer [19][20][21][22][23][24][25]. However, no studies have evaluated the interactions between clinicopathological and metabolic prognostic factors for risk stratification.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the distribution and characteristics of the maxSUV must be known before courses of treatment can be determined. The maxSUV was the highest for the triple-negative type among all of the subtypes [19]. In the future, steps are needed to determine the cut-offs for each subtype in more patients including those with luminal, HER-2 and triple-negative breast cancers, to determine courses of treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multivariate analyses included variables determined to have P<0.05 in the univariate analyses; P<0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance in all tests. Data were statistically analyzed using SPSS software version 10.5 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) (23).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%