2021
DOI: 10.1177/03057356211010217
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of expectancy in physiological responses to sound recognition of musical dissonance and timbral change

Abstract: Recently, it has been suggested that tonal violations produce greater skin conductance response (SCR) than timbral violations in music listening. However, it is unknown how people focus their attention during musical excerpts. The aim of this study is to replicate previous research considering two psychophysiological mechanisms: prediction error and brain stem reflex. Twenty-seven nonmusicians were instructed to listen six melodies and detect three altered conditions in one note: a dissonance (note out-of-key)… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 18 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Later works confirm that the structure of the music plays a determining role in how music evokes emotions in people (Coutinho & Cangelosi, 2011; Peretz & Coltheart, 2003; Saiz-Clar et al, 2019; Saiz-Clar & Reales, 2018). Some of these studies present the stimulus’s structural characteristics as good predictors of the subjective emotional response (Saiz-Clar & Reales, 2018) and physiological response (Gomez & Danuser, 2007; Jover-Fernández et al, 2021). Many of these studies employed dimensions or variables taken from music theory as the predictive variables of subjective emotion or psychophysiological responses, although descriptive parameters of the frequency domain (e.g., the power-spectrum centroid) or short-time Fourier transform features have also been used (Coutinho & Cangelosi, 2011).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Later works confirm that the structure of the music plays a determining role in how music evokes emotions in people (Coutinho & Cangelosi, 2011; Peretz & Coltheart, 2003; Saiz-Clar et al, 2019; Saiz-Clar & Reales, 2018). Some of these studies present the stimulus’s structural characteristics as good predictors of the subjective emotional response (Saiz-Clar & Reales, 2018) and physiological response (Gomez & Danuser, 2007; Jover-Fernández et al, 2021). Many of these studies employed dimensions or variables taken from music theory as the predictive variables of subjective emotion or psychophysiological responses, although descriptive parameters of the frequency domain (e.g., the power-spectrum centroid) or short-time Fourier transform features have also been used (Coutinho & Cangelosi, 2011).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%