2005
DOI: 10.1164/rccm.200502-258oc
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of Endogenous Serotonin in Modulating Genioglossus Muscle Activity in Awake and Sleeping Rats

Abstract: The results show a minimal endogenous serotonergic drive at the HMN modulating GG activity across sleep-wake states, unless augmented by reflex inputs. This result has implications for pharmacologic strategies aiming to increase GG activity by manipulating endogenous serotonin in patients with obstructive sleep apnea.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
128
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(141 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
12
128
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The magnitude of the depression in GG EMG activity during sleep (Jelev et al, 2001;Sood et al, 2005;Horner, 2008a;Lu and Kubin, 2009) depends strongly on posture, vestibular inputs, and state-dependent neuromodulators (Megirian et al, 1985;Rossiter and Yates, 1996;Horner et al, 2002;Horner, 2008b). Our results suggest that urethane anesthesia does not interfere with the neuromodulatory processes controlling GG muscular activity, at the level of either the motoneuron or premotoneuron networks that determine muscle activity.…”
Section: State-dependent Respiratory Muscle Modulation During Urethanmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…The magnitude of the depression in GG EMG activity during sleep (Jelev et al, 2001;Sood et al, 2005;Horner, 2008a;Lu and Kubin, 2009) depends strongly on posture, vestibular inputs, and state-dependent neuromodulators (Megirian et al, 1985;Rossiter and Yates, 1996;Horner et al, 2002;Horner, 2008b). Our results suggest that urethane anesthesia does not interfere with the neuromodulatory processes controlling GG muscular activity, at the level of either the motoneuron or premotoneuron networks that determine muscle activity.…”
Section: State-dependent Respiratory Muscle Modulation During Urethanmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Mean neck muscle activity, diaphragm amplitude and respiratory rate were also calculated in the same consecutive 5 s time-bins for all the periods of sleep and wakefulness in each rat. One rat was excluded from the analysis of genioglossus muscle activity as no respiratory-related activity was recorded under any circumstances during the experiment, which is highly atypical of the rats in this and other studies from our laboratory (Sood et al, 2005;Chan et al, 2006;Younes et al, 2007;Steenland et al, 2008), and as such was a possible indicator that the electrodes were in a different tongue muscle in that animal. In addition, in the potential event of there being little effect of 8-OH-DPAT on the amplitude of respiratory-related genioglossus, such a minimal effect could not be reliably attributed to a lack of drug effect per se and may simply have been due to the fact that there was little/no signal to suppress.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rats were then implanted with electroencephalogram (EEG) and neck electromyogram (EMG) electrodes for determination of sleep-wake states and with genioglossus and diaphragm electrodes for respiratory muscle recordings (Morrison et al, 2003;Sood et al, 2005;Chan et al, 2006). Tests for the accurate placement of the genioglossus electrodes and their function throughout the experiments included EMG recordings during surgery and observing tongue movements in response to electrical stimulation of the genioglossal wires at both the beginning and end of the experiments (Morrison et al, 2003;Sood et al, 2005;Chan et al, 2006). Removal of the tongue, by dissection, at the completion of all experiments confirmed the physical location of the electrodes to the genioglossus muscle.…”
Section: Surgical Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using a stereotaxic frame (model 962; David Kopf Instruments), microdialysis guides (CMA/11; Chromatography Sciences Company) were targeted 3 mm above the HMN during surgery (Morrison et al, 2003;Sood et al, 2005;Chan et al, 2006). The guides were placed 13.89 Ϯ 0.11 mm posterior to bregma, 0.12 Ϯ 0.012 mm lateral to the midline, and 6.99 Ϯ 0.071 mm ventral to bregma.…”
Section: Surgical Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation