Role of Email in Intercultural Communication of Criticism in a Chinese English Curriculum Reform Context

Abstract

Western teachers working in China often experience cultural conflicts arising from, for instance, the ways that Chinese students perceive face and express criticism. To better understand these face-concerned conflicts, this paper explores the role and significance of email for a group of Chinese students to communicate pedagogical criticism with their western teacher as part of an undergraduate program in Communicative Language Teaching (CLT). A quantitative and qualitative examination of the politeness strategies employed by the Chinese students in their critical emails revealed the three roles of email: email as a safe, polite and effective channel for the Chinese students to express critical views directly (without turning to a third party) and collectively (on behalf of the other students), email as a major means for their western teacher to be informed about problems privately, and email as a springboard for the western teacher to communicate later with more other students publicly. What was criticized in the emails indicated the fundamental disparities in their perceptions of knowledge, the identity of English, and the classroom behavior of silence. Interpretation and discussion of findings were informed by the studies of Chinese psychology and the writer's insider knowledge gained from her four-year longitudinal participant observation.

How do celebrities respond to criticism in media interviews? The case of an Egyptian TV show

“…Studies on criticizing have been conducted in both the written and oral modes of communication. In writing, a number of studies examined the evaluative language of book reviews (e.g., Araújo, 2012;Hyland, 2004;Itakura & Tsui, 2011), teachers' and peer feedback on students' work (e.g., Hyland & Hyland, 2001, 2006Lee, 2009) and criticism through electronic communication (e.g., Hosseinizadeh & Moqadam, 2019;Lü, 2018). As for oral communication, sample studies include analyses of televised talent competitions (Chen & Rau, 2015;Tang, 2016), teacher-student interaction (e.g., Cao, 2005;El-Dakhs, Ambreen, Zaheer, & Gusarova, 2019;Riekkinen, 2010) and the pragmatic competence of language learners (e.g., Nguyen, 2013Nguyen, , 2008aNguyen, , 2008b.…”

Friendship Group Activities: Voices from Chinese EFL Learners

“…Another effect can be seen in the discourse system. As opposed to the Utilitarian language system that seeks brevity and clarity in western culture (Lv, 2018), Chinese learners are accustomed to 'think thrice before acting' (Wang, 2012). They are more likely to leave room in communication as a way to protect the harmony and face images, e.g.…”

The Art of Saying “No” to University Students: A Pragmatic Analysis of the Speech Act of Refusal in Teacher-Student Role-Plays

“…First, examining the realization of different speech acts in teacher-student talk is under-researched in the literature. Earlier studies have mainly focused on the speech acts of praising and criticizing (e.g., El-Dakhs, Ambreen, Zaheer, & Gusarova, 2019;Hyland & Hyland, 2001;Lü, 2018) while other speech acts, including the refusal of requests, have not been examined. This is an intriguing gap in the literature since findings in this regard can provide insightful feedback for theoretical models and pedagogical practices in relation to teacherstudent interactions.…”