2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrnm.2013.09.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion weighted MRI in evaluation of necrosis of hepatocellular carcinoma after chemoembolization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

3
6
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
3
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results are equivalent with those of Ebeed et al [5], Osama et al [14], and Goshima et al . [16] showing that DCE MRI is to be predominant to DWI in assessing post TACE treatment response and DWI is not continuously a solid indicator of HCC post treatment viability in comparison to DCE MRI [5,14,16].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Our results are equivalent with those of Ebeed et al [5], Osama et al [14], and Goshima et al . [16] showing that DCE MRI is to be predominant to DWI in assessing post TACE treatment response and DWI is not continuously a solid indicator of HCC post treatment viability in comparison to DCE MRI [5,14,16].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Our results are equivalent with those of Ebeed et al [5], Osama et al [14], and Goshima et al . [16] showing that DCE MRI is to be predominant to DWI in assessing post TACE treatment response and DWI is not continuously a solid indicator of HCC post treatment viability in comparison to DCE MRI [5,14,16]. As in our study, DCE MRI had a sensitivity of 100%, a specificity of 95.25%, a positive predictive value of 95%, a negative predictive value of 100%, and overall agreement of 97.5% while DWI statistics values are 52.63%, 90.48%, 83.33%, 67.86%, and 72.5% respectively.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our results differ from Osama et al ,[11] who observed higher sensitivity of DWI (100%) with a similar specificity of 65.5%. The best ADC cut-off value in this study was 1.26 × 10 −3 mm 2 /s.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%