2019
DOI: 10.1007/s40944-019-0305-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Evaluation of Ovarian Tumours

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 20 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even normal ovaries may exhibit restricted diffusion, and thus, image interpretation in conjunction with the results of other image sequences is essential. The probable cutoff value of the ADC value to differentiate between malignant and benign adnexal masses was reported to be 1.13 × 10 −3 mm 2 /s in previous literature [25,26] and 1.27 × 10 −3 mm 2 /s in our study. However, the ADC values of two teratomas (0.54 × 10 −3 mm 2 /s and 0.99 × 10 −3 mm 2 /s, respectively) were lower than these cutoff values and were found to be lower than those of malignant masses in our study; these results are comparable with those of Kim et al [22], which might explain the high sensitivity but low specificity of using ADC cutoff values alone as an indicator of malignancy.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Even normal ovaries may exhibit restricted diffusion, and thus, image interpretation in conjunction with the results of other image sequences is essential. The probable cutoff value of the ADC value to differentiate between malignant and benign adnexal masses was reported to be 1.13 × 10 −3 mm 2 /s in previous literature [25,26] and 1.27 × 10 −3 mm 2 /s in our study. However, the ADC values of two teratomas (0.54 × 10 −3 mm 2 /s and 0.99 × 10 −3 mm 2 /s, respectively) were lower than these cutoff values and were found to be lower than those of malignant masses in our study; these results are comparable with those of Kim et al [22], which might explain the high sensitivity but low specificity of using ADC cutoff values alone as an indicator of malignancy.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%