2009
DOI: 10.1016/s0976-0016(11)60530-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of Cryopreservation in Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Vitrification is a technically simple method (Do et al, 2016a;Rios et al, 2010), which does not require the use of a programmable freezer (Hasler, 2014;Sinha, 2009;Vajta and Nagy, 2006). Laboratory experiments have indicated that in vitro-produced bovine embryos cryopreserved by vitrification achieve a better survival rate than do those cryopreserved by slow freezing (Do et al, 2017;Gómez et al, 2008;Mucci et al, 2006;Yu et al, 2010).…”
Section: (B) Vitrificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Vitrification is a technically simple method (Do et al, 2016a;Rios et al, 2010), which does not require the use of a programmable freezer (Hasler, 2014;Sinha, 2009;Vajta and Nagy, 2006). Laboratory experiments have indicated that in vitro-produced bovine embryos cryopreserved by vitrification achieve a better survival rate than do those cryopreserved by slow freezing (Do et al, 2017;Gómez et al, 2008;Mucci et al, 2006;Yu et al, 2010).…”
Section: (B) Vitrificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While vitrification appears more favourable than slow freezing, further investigation is required to compare its efficacy with the slow freezing method (Sinha, 2009). Moreover, although limited data on pregnancy rates are available (Gutnisky et al, 2013;Kim et al, 2012;Nedambale et al, 2004), the reported sample sizes were relatively small.…”
Section: Limitations Of Current Vitrification Protocolsmentioning
confidence: 99%