2020
DOI: 10.1177/2048872618813843
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of coronary angiography in patients with a non-diagnostic electrocardiogram following out of hospital cardiac arrest: Rationale and design of the multicentre randomized controlled COUPE trial

Abstract: Background: Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a major cause of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). The role of emergency coronary angiography (CAG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) following cardiac arrest in patients without ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) remains unclear. Aims: We aim to assess whether emergency CAG and PCI, when indicated, will improve survival with good neurological outcome in post-OHCA patients without STEMI who remain comatose. Methods: COUPE is a prospec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The clinically most meaningful difference between both trials is that the COACT study enrolled only patients with OHCA with a shockable arrest rhythm, whereas the TOMAHAWK trial recruited patients with both shockable and nonshockable rhythms and thus a broader risk spectrum. In addition to the 2 large trials (TOMAHAWK and COACT), 4 small randomized trials comparing immediate and delayed or selective coronary angiography in OHCA have been published . At short-term follow-up, there was also no benefit of emergency angiography.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The clinically most meaningful difference between both trials is that the COACT study enrolled only patients with OHCA with a shockable arrest rhythm, whereas the TOMAHAWK trial recruited patients with both shockable and nonshockable rhythms and thus a broader risk spectrum. In addition to the 2 large trials (TOMAHAWK and COACT), 4 small randomized trials comparing immediate and delayed or selective coronary angiography in OHCA have been published . At short-term follow-up, there was also no benefit of emergency angiography.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several ongoing RCTs address the question of the present analysis, including trials either in both comatose and non‐comatose OHCA survivors (DISCO 16 and COUPE 17 ) or solely in non‐comatose patients (DISCO‐noCOMA 18 ). However, the results of the published RCTs are consistent and the present meta‐analysis does not support a recommendation of early coronary angiography in patients with OHCA without ST‐segment elevation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several randomized clinical trials are still ongoing [ 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 ]. Results from pilot studies from the DISCO (Direct or subacute coronary angiography in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest), ARREST trial (A randomized trial of expedited transfer to a cardiac arrest center for non-STE ventricular fibrillation OHCA) and from the prematurely terminated PEARL trial (Early coronary angiography versus delayed coronary angiography) are already available and confirmed no significant difference in mortality between early and delayed CAG in OHCA without STE ( Table 1 ).…”
Section: Clinical Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%