2002
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2273.2002.00605.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of computerized tomography (CT) scan of the chest in patients with newly diagnosed head and neck cancers

Abstract: Chest metastases and second primaries are not uncommon in patients with head and neck cancer. Early detection of a second site of malignant disease may alter prognosis and management. This study assessed the diagnostic yield of chest radiographs compared with computerized tomography (CT) in a series of patients with head and neck cancer. Forty-four consecutive patients with a head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) attending the head and neck surgery department of Cumberland Infirmary, Carlisle, between Ja… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the initial 2 to 3 years of followup, intensive chest screening has been suggested at 4-to 6-month intervals rather than annually. 4 Chest CT is superior to radiography in sensitivity and adds little extra time and radiation dose (3-6 msv) when performed with neck CT. 10,13 However, chest CT is more expensive, and its indications vary widely as a screening tool for HNSCC.…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the initial 2 to 3 years of followup, intensive chest screening has been suggested at 4-to 6-month intervals rather than annually. 4 Chest CT is superior to radiography in sensitivity and adds little extra time and radiation dose (3-6 msv) when performed with neck CT. 10,13 However, chest CT is more expensive, and its indications vary widely as a screening tool for HNSCC.…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pulmonary metastases can be detected by either plain X-ray or chest computed tomography (CCT). X-ray is less sensitive than CCT (33% vs 75%) [2,[6][7][8], but lesions detected by X-ray usually have greater clinical significance. CCT can detect lung nodules under 2-3 mm in size, but in up to 30% of these cases it is not possible to determine whether these lesions are malignant [8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it involves a considerable dose of radiation (on average 8 mSv, the equivalent of 400 chest X‐rays [CXRs]). Some centers routinely undertake chest CT in all patients with HNSCC,2–10 whereas others selectively screen those with clinical stage III or IV disease, or using other clinical criteria such as presence of nodal disease 1, 11–24. In patients with HNSCC, most chest malignancy occurs in the lung apices or mediastinal lymph nodes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%