2007
DOI: 10.1063/1.2715552
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of charge transfer configurations in LaMnO3, CaMnO3, and CaFeO3

Abstract: A simple scheme is proposed to analyze the N-electron wave function obtained in embedded cluster calculations in valence bond terms such as ligand-to-metal charge transfer and non-charge-transfer determinants. The analysis is based on a unitary transformation of pairs of natural orbitals to optimal atomiclike orbitals. The procedure is applied to compare the degree of ionicity in NiO and MnO and to explain the existence or absence of Jahn-Teller distortions in LaMnO3, CaMnO3, and CaFeO3. The authors find that … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(40 reference statements)
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the most popular complete‐active‐space‐self‐consistent‐field (CASSCF) methods,6 which deal correctly with diradicals and some dinuclear magnetic complexes (see comprehensive review7), cannot handle systems with larger number of odd electrons due to a huge number of configurations generated in the active space of the system. To imagine arising technical difficulties, it is worthwhile to cite,7 “If there are “ m ” singly occupied orbitals on each of “ n ” identical centers, then 2 mn Slater determinants can be formed by assigning spins up or down each of the “ nm ” orbitals.” So that no CASSCF type approach, including a simplified embedded‐cluster CASSCF supplemented by the complete active space second‐order perturbation theory (CASPT2),8 seems feasible for many‐odd electron systems such as, say, fullerenes. That is why addressing single‐determinant approaches turns out to be the only practically meaningful alternate.…”
Section: The Main Issues Of the Odd‐electron Molecular Theory Of Sp2 mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the most popular complete‐active‐space‐self‐consistent‐field (CASSCF) methods,6 which deal correctly with diradicals and some dinuclear magnetic complexes (see comprehensive review7), cannot handle systems with larger number of odd electrons due to a huge number of configurations generated in the active space of the system. To imagine arising technical difficulties, it is worthwhile to cite,7 “If there are “ m ” singly occupied orbitals on each of “ n ” identical centers, then 2 mn Slater determinants can be formed by assigning spins up or down each of the “ nm ” orbitals.” So that no CASSCF type approach, including a simplified embedded‐cluster CASSCF supplemented by the complete active space second‐order perturbation theory (CASPT2),8 seems feasible for many‐odd electron systems such as, say, fullerenes. That is why addressing single‐determinant approaches turns out to be the only practically meaningful alternate.…”
Section: The Main Issues Of the Odd‐electron Molecular Theory Of Sp2 mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2͒. 25 This transformation leaves any observable expectation value unchanged and affords a valence-bond ͑VB͒type analysis.…”
Section: Microscopic Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This active space offers a solid footing to describe the electronic ground state of NiO (Ref. 100) and the excited states arising from internal Ni d-d excitations and from the lowest LMCT excitations. The so-obtained zero-order wave function is further improved by the aforementioned CASPT2 approach, a second-order perturbation treatment of the remaining dynamic electron correlation.…”
Section: A Combination Of Car-parrinello MD With Caspt2mentioning
confidence: 99%