2021
DOI: 10.12659/ajcr.932365
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of Cerebrolysin® in Rehabilitation in Ischemic Stroke: A Case Report

Abstract: Patient: Male, 71-year-old Final Diagnosis: Stroke Symptoms: Hemiplegia Medication: — Clinical Procedure: — Specialty: Rehabilitation Objective: Unusual or unexpected effect of treatment Background: The criterion standard treatments for ischemic stroke patients, starting from systemic thrombolysis and/or undergoing endovascular recanalization therapy to intensive rehabilitation, are the best options… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
(16 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The understanding of the physio-pathological processes can lead to new treatment strategies. Because of the promising results of some neuroprotective treatments in the experimental setup [ 24 , 26 ] and clinical practice [ 25 , 49 ], we investigated if this kind of treatment could also help protect patients suffering from liver damage. Although the treatment did not yield a huge behavior change, with both treated and untreated groups being less mobile ( Figure 3 d,e) compared to sham and no apparent short-term memory benefit being observed ( Figure 3 g), we did see some cellular benefits to the treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The understanding of the physio-pathological processes can lead to new treatment strategies. Because of the promising results of some neuroprotective treatments in the experimental setup [ 24 , 26 ] and clinical practice [ 25 , 49 ], we investigated if this kind of treatment could also help protect patients suffering from liver damage. Although the treatment did not yield a huge behavior change, with both treated and untreated groups being less mobile ( Figure 3 d,e) compared to sham and no apparent short-term memory benefit being observed ( Figure 3 g), we did see some cellular benefits to the treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%