1995
DOI: 10.1002/jat.2550150110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of cellulose in wood dust‐induced fibrosing alveo‐bronchiolitis in rat

Abstract: Our experiments suggest that in the development of plant dust-induced fibrosing alveobronchiolitis--Scadding's fibrosing alveolitis--the cellulose content of plant dusts has a decisive aetiological role. Namely, the wood dust (pine) and the cellulose induced morphologically identical granulomatous inflammation and fibrosis, whereas the fibre-free extract of wood dust did not cause pathological changes in the lungs. The induction of H2O2 and superoxide anion production, shown in vitro in leucocytes, probably ha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are surprising because aspen is generally regarded as relatively nontoxic, but to our knowledge, all previous relevant studies have been brief, and did not use a paper bedding comparable with AlphaDri or Omega-Dri (Tö rrö nen et al 1989, Odynets et al 1991, Holland & Griffin 2000. The histological analysis did not allow us to identify the agent responsible for the pathology, but candidates could include: (a) microorganisms inherent in the material (Ewaldsson et al 2002, Kaliste et al 2004; (b) toxic volatile substances associated with the source material or processing products (Tö rrö nen et al 1989, Odynets et al 1991; and (c) cellulose dust (Milton et al 1990, Tatrai et al 1995, Kaliste et al 2004). Ammonia was not the cause because it neither differed with bedding type nor correlated with sneezing or respiratory pathology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results are surprising because aspen is generally regarded as relatively nontoxic, but to our knowledge, all previous relevant studies have been brief, and did not use a paper bedding comparable with AlphaDri or Omega-Dri (Tö rrö nen et al 1989, Odynets et al 1991, Holland & Griffin 2000. The histological analysis did not allow us to identify the agent responsible for the pathology, but candidates could include: (a) microorganisms inherent in the material (Ewaldsson et al 2002, Kaliste et al 2004; (b) toxic volatile substances associated with the source material or processing products (Tö rrö nen et al 1989, Odynets et al 1991; and (c) cellulose dust (Milton et al 1990, Tatrai et al 1995, Kaliste et al 2004). Ammonia was not the cause because it neither differed with bedding type nor correlated with sneezing or respiratory pathology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, pulmonary changes were found in animals housed for 5 weeks on contact bedding containing endotoxin and (1→3)β-D-glucan, a cell wall component of molds, certain bacteria and plants [7]. Both pine wood dust and cellulose induced morphologically identical granulomatous inflammation and fibrosis in lungs of animals [2,23]. Wood chip bedding used in the present study was made from spruce, a Pinaceae.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Recently, insoluble particles have been suspected of being involved in the development of granulomatous pneumonia [5,23]. Thus, we investigated the relationship between environmental particles and granulomatous pneumonia, as animal housing rooms are known to have high numbers of ambient air particles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Toxicity studies have been conducted on many different forms of cellulose from wood [Tatrai et al, 1995] and soft paper dusts [Jarvholm et al, 1988] to pure microcrystalline cellulose [Adamson et al, 1999]; however, toxicological data for CI are lacking. Because the potential toxicity of cellulose is highly dependent upon the physical and chemical form, one cannot evaluate the toxicity of CI based upon toxicity data available for other forms of cellulose.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%