2022
DOI: 10.1111/echo.15466
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in COVID‐19 recovered patients: A short‐term follow‐up study

Abstract: Objective Cardiac involvement in recovered COVID‐19 patients assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Methods Subjects recently recovered from COVID‐19 and with an abnormal left ventricular global longitudinal strain were enrolled. Cardiac MRI in all the enrolled subjects was done at baseline (within 30–90 days following recovery from COVID‐19) with a follow‐up scan at 6 months in individuals with an abnormal baseline scan. Additionally, 20 age‐and sex‐matched individuals were enrolled as healthy … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 31 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In concordance to our study, Huang et al [5] revealed that global native T1, T2, and ECV values were significantly greater in recovered COVID-19 patients with positive conventional CMR findings than in patients without positive findings (native T1 1,271 ms versus 1,237 ms, P=0.002), (T2 42.7± 3.1 ms vs 38.1± 2.4 ms, P=0.005), (ECV 28.2% vs 24.8%, P=0.001). Also, Kunal et al [17] reported significantly elevated native T1 (1301ms Vs 1264 ms, P =0.022) and native T2 (55.62 vs 45.25 ms, P =0.004) in post Covid-19 patients with abnormal CMR group compared to the other one with normal CMR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In concordance to our study, Huang et al [5] revealed that global native T1, T2, and ECV values were significantly greater in recovered COVID-19 patients with positive conventional CMR findings than in patients without positive findings (native T1 1,271 ms versus 1,237 ms, P=0.002), (T2 42.7± 3.1 ms vs 38.1± 2.4 ms, P=0.005), (ECV 28.2% vs 24.8%, P=0.001). Also, Kunal et al [17] reported significantly elevated native T1 (1301ms Vs 1264 ms, P =0.022) and native T2 (55.62 vs 45.25 ms, P =0.004) in post Covid-19 patients with abnormal CMR group compared to the other one with normal CMR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%