Role of brand attachment in customers’ evaluation of service failure

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to examine the role of brand attachment as a relevant construct in customers’ evaluation after they face a service failure which impacts future consumer behaviors. It mainly answers the research question: does brand attachment cushion or amplify the effect of service failure on customers’ negative emotions? Design/methodology/approach A 2 × 2 × 2 experimental design was conducted. Data analysis was performed with ANOVA and moderated mediation. Findings Customer’s feelings toward a brand (brand attachment) that existed before a service failure occurred can regulate customer’s negative emotions especially when consumer attribute service failure to a controllable cause. This process minimizes the effect of service failure in customer’s satisfaction and consequently increase customer behaviors like word of mouth and loyalty intentions. Research limitations/implications Adding perceived intentionality as a service failure’s attribution could provide another layer of explanation of customer behavior. Also, an expanded study using a sector characterized by higher cost of change and permanent consumption could provide result’s generalizability. Practical implications Brand attachment should be included in the customer service strategy. In a service failure situation, brand attachment becomes part of the “service customer policy” helping customers to regulate their negative emotions. Originality/value This study fills the knowledge gap regarding the role of customers’ positive emotions toward brands when a service failure occurs. The current study extends branding literature by differentiating brand attachment role from coping tactics.

The relationship of brand attachment and mobile banking service quality with positive word-of-mouth

“…Park et al (2010, p. 2) define brand attachment as the strength of the connection between the self and the brand. Our study takes this definition into account, as do several others (Kaufmann et al, 2016;Aboulnasr and Tran, 2020;Saavedra Torres et al, 2020). Brand attachment is an important concept in marketing because it has significant implications in the realm of consumer perceptions, evaluations and behavior (Japutra et al, 2014;Aboulnasr and Tran, 2020).…”

Exploring consumers’ attitude formation toward their own brands when in crisis: cross-national comparisons between USA and China

“…As such, it is basically assumed that brand owners would have a certain level of attachment once they own it (Dommer and Winterich, 2021), namely, a brand attachment that is defined as "the strength of the cognitive and emotional bond connecting the brand with the self" (Park et al, 2006, p. 3). Once the brand attachment is formed, it is not easily broken by external factors such as a brand crisis and even it severs as a buffer to alleviate aggravating effects by the crisis (Torres et al, 2020). This is because people are inclined to retain the self-concept intact that positive emotions attached to a brand are conducive to activate a motivation to justify the crisis (Lee, 2016;Schmalz and Orth, 2012).…”

The role of co-creation experience in engaging customers with service brands

“…Consumer-brand relationship is becoming the mainstay of marketing research (Centeno et al, 2019;Coelho et al, 2019;Hussain et al, 2020), where EBA helps brands to maintain sustainable relational bonds with customers (Torres et al, 2020). EBA is conceptualized as the emotion-laden relationship of consumers with the brand that minimizes their switching behavior (Torres et al, 2020;Vlachos et al, 2010).…”