1997
DOI: 10.1007/s002130050354
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of behavioral and pharmacological variables in the loss of tolerance to amphetamine hypophagia

Abstract: Tolerance to amphetamine-induced hypophagia is lost when drug injections are withdrawn for 4 weeks while milk tests are continued (Wolgin and Hughes 1996). The purpose of this study was to determine whether the loss of tolerance is a function of drug withdrawal per se. Rats made tolerant to amphetamine (2 mg/kg, IP) were assigned to one of three groups. During the next 4 weeks (phase), one group continued to receive amphetamine injections prior to daily milk tests (Before group), one group received drug inject… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When daily administration of presession cocaine was replaced with that of saline, dose-response curves were shifted to the left and in most cases recaptured the effects observed during the Acute Phase (Figure 2). These results are congruent with those from studies using rats as subjects investigating the effects of psychomotor stimulants, mainly amphetamine, which have generally shown attenuation of tolerance when sessions were experienced in the absence of drug (Hughes, Popi, & Wolgin, 1999;Poulous, Wilkinson, & Cappell, 1981;Wolgin & Hughes, 1997. The study conducted with pigeons and cocaine most similar to the current one has shown similar findings (Pinkston & Branch, 2004b; although see Stafford, Branch, & Hughes, 1994 for an exception).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…When daily administration of presession cocaine was replaced with that of saline, dose-response curves were shifted to the left and in most cases recaptured the effects observed during the Acute Phase (Figure 2). These results are congruent with those from studies using rats as subjects investigating the effects of psychomotor stimulants, mainly amphetamine, which have generally shown attenuation of tolerance when sessions were experienced in the absence of drug (Hughes, Popi, & Wolgin, 1999;Poulous, Wilkinson, & Cappell, 1981;Wolgin & Hughes, 1997. The study conducted with pigeons and cocaine most similar to the current one has shown similar findings (Pinkston & Branch, 2004b; although see Stafford, Branch, & Hughes, 1994 for an exception).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Lattal, 1995). For example, tolerance to amphetamine's effects on milk drinking in rats dissipated when milk drinking was later permitted during saline administration, whereas it did not dissipate if rats were simply given time off and had no opportunity to drink (Hughes, Popi, & Wolgin, 1999;Wolgin & Hughes, 1997). Wolgin and colleagues hypothesized that the learned compensatory responses of the rats permitted to drink decreased.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the instrumental learning model, tolerance involves learning to suppress stereotyped movements that interfere with the appetitive phase of feeding (Wolgin, 1989(Wolgin, , 2000. Initial evidence supporting this model came from studies showing an inverse relation between total intake per session and the frequency of stereotyped movements (Salisbury & Wolgin, 1985;Wolgin et al, 1987;Wolgin & Hughes, 1997). More persuasive evidence was obtained from an experiment in which rats were reinforced with intraoral infusions of milk for holding their heads stationary within a narrow area of space defined by intersecting photobeams (Wolgin & Wade, 1995).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%