2007
DOI: 10.1099/mic.0.2007/006031-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of autolysin-mediated DNA release in biofilm formation of Staphylococcus epidermidis

Abstract: Staphylococcus epidermidis has become a serious nosocomial pathogen frequently causing infections associated with implanted foreign materials. Biofilm formation is considered a major factor determining S. epidermidis pathogenicity in such device-associated infections. Here, evidence is presented that extracellular DNA is important for the initial phase of biofilm development by S. epidermidis on polystyrene or glass surfaces under static or hydrodynamic conditions. Comparative PCR amplification from S. epiderm… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

23
394
1
4

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 414 publications
(422 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
23
394
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, the significance of eDNA for cellular attachment and structural integrity has more recently been recognized for an increasing number of Gram-negative and Grampositive species (Whitchurch et al, 2002;Steinberger and Holden, 2005;Allesen-Holm et al, 2006;Moscoso et al, 2006;Jurcisek and Bakaletz, 2007;Qin et al, 2007;Izano et al, 2008;Thomas et al, 2008;Heijstra et al, 2009;Vilain et al, 2009;Harmsen et al, 2010;Lappann et al, 2010). Release of DNA in bacterial biofilms has mainly been attributed to the lysis of a cellular subpopulation, mediated by the activity of autolysis systems (Allesen-Holm et al, 2006;Rice et al, 2007;Thomas et al, 2008Thomas et al, , 2009Mann et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast, the significance of eDNA for cellular attachment and structural integrity has more recently been recognized for an increasing number of Gram-negative and Grampositive species (Whitchurch et al, 2002;Steinberger and Holden, 2005;Allesen-Holm et al, 2006;Moscoso et al, 2006;Jurcisek and Bakaletz, 2007;Qin et al, 2007;Izano et al, 2008;Thomas et al, 2008;Heijstra et al, 2009;Vilain et al, 2009;Harmsen et al, 2010;Lappann et al, 2010). Release of DNA in bacterial biofilms has mainly been attributed to the lysis of a cellular subpopulation, mediated by the activity of autolysis systems (Allesen-Holm et al, 2006;Rice et al, 2007;Thomas et al, 2008Thomas et al, , 2009Mann et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other factors implicated in cell lysis are toxin/antitoxin system that have been characterized, for example, in Enterococcus faecalis (Thomas et al, 2008) and Staphylococcus sp. (Qin et al, 2007;Rice et al, 2007;Mann et al, 2009). However, a role for toxin/antitoxin systems in biofilm formation is not necessarily directly linked to cell lysis, as has been demonstrated for E. coli (Kim et al, , 2010.…”
Section: Mutants Lacking the Prophages Are Defective In Biofilm Formamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whitchurch et al (166) first demonstrated that P. aeruginosa PAO1 biofilm formation was significantly reduced under flowing conditions in the presence of DNase. eDNA has been subsequently shown to contribute to biofilm formation by clinical P. aeruginosa isolates as well as by a variety of bacterial species, including Staphylococcus epidermidis, through analyses of biofilm formation by lysis-defective mutants and of DNA removal from the biofilm matrix (67,117,133,146,150). The contribution of eDNA to attachment and biofilm formation, however, appears to be temporal: experiments utilizing DNase I have suggested that cells in young PAO1 biofilms are held together by eDNA, whereas the cells in more-mature PAO1 biofilms are held together primarily by components other than eDNA (98,166).…”
Section: Being Sticky Is the Keymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To target biofilm formation to inhibit persistence and recurrent infection, substances are being investigated that can inhibit secretion of biofilm components, biofilm matrix formation or destroy or resolve existing biofilm matrices. Furthermore, DNase I can degrade the extracellular DNA present in the biofilm matrix (Okshevsky et al 2015;Qin et al 2007), interfering with its formation and stability as shown for Bordetella pertussis (Conover et al 2011), Listeria monocytogenes (Harmsen et al, 2010), and Campylobacter jejuni (Brown et al 2015). A bacterial glycoside hydrolase, named Dispersin B, has been isolated from Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans, which was shown to disrupt mature Actinobacillus biofilms (Rasko et al 2008;Stephenson et al 2000;Wilke et al 2015;Worthington et al 2013).…”
Section: Prevention and Resolution Of Biofilmsmentioning
confidence: 99%