2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmp.2008.11.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of attention, memory, and covariation-detection processes in clinically significant eating-disorder symptoms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, in the current study, participants completed an implicit attention task prior to the explicit risk classification task. We used a prototype classification task (Treat, Viken, Kruschke, & McFall, 2010; Viken, Treat, Nosofsky, McFall, & Palmeri, 2002), in which participants first viewed two prototypical vignettes reflecting important differences in both victimization risk and popularity impact. Participants then classified additional vignettes as more similar to one or the other prototype, without experimenter instruction or feedback about the basis for their decisions.…”
Section: The Present Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, in the current study, participants completed an implicit attention task prior to the explicit risk classification task. We used a prototype classification task (Treat, Viken, Kruschke, & McFall, 2010; Viken, Treat, Nosofsky, McFall, & Palmeri, 2002), in which participants first viewed two prototypical vignettes reflecting important differences in both victimization risk and popularity impact. Participants then classified additional vignettes as more similar to one or the other prototype, without experimenter instruction or feedback about the basis for their decisions.…”
Section: The Present Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More generally, the presented work illustrates what hybrid clinical-cognitive science has to offer (a) clinical scientists’ efforts to understand and modify processing patterns linked to psychopathology; and (b) cognitive scientists’ efforts to evaluate the generalizability of their approaches to more complex, socially relevant circumstances (e.g., Lee & Webb, 2005). A growing body of research attests to the portability of cognitive science approaches to examinations of clinically relevant processing (e.g., Farris, Viken, & Treat, in press; Neufeld, 2007; Treat et al, in press; Viken et al, 2002). Thus, the time is ripe for the rapid exploration of the relatively unmapped region of quantitative clinical-cognitive science.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, we evaluated the extent to which attention, memory, and correlation-detection processes operate differently among high-, medium-, and low-symptom college-aged women (Treat, Viken, Kruschke, & McFall, in press). Participants first completed the prototype classification task with 28 photo stimuli, followed by a recognition memory task.…”
Section: Attention and Memory Processes In Disordered Eatingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, it is not clear if memory in general is affected by restrained eating habits or just specific memories related to certain cues. Furthermore, Treat, Viken, Kruschke, and McFall (2010) investigated how information processing occurred among women, specifically in their attention, memory, and covariation-detection processes in eating disorder symptoms. Covariation-detection was determined by participants making judgments about other women's body sizes and affects through photographs.…”
Section: International Journal Of Research Studies In Psychology 89mentioning
confidence: 99%