1981
DOI: 10.1128/iai.31.3.1223-1231.1981
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of antibody to leukocytosis-promoting factor hemagglutinin and to filamentous hemagglutinin in immunity to pertussis

Abstract: Gamma globulins were obtained from rabbits hyperimmunized with the filamentous hemagglutinin (FHA) or the leukocytosis-promoting factor hemagglutinin (LPF. HA) of Bordetella pertussis. Double immunodiffusion analyses showed the antibodies to be highly specific for the homologous antigen. Intraperitoneal injection of anti-FHA or anti-LPF HA into 10-day-old ICR mice 30 min before aerosol challenge with B. pertussis protected the mice from disease as evidenced by survival and a normal rate of gain in body weight.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
71
1

Year Published

1984
1984
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 154 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
71
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There has been considerable debate whether FHA can confer protection against B. pertussis infection. Some murine studies have indicated that FHA is not protective [8,9], supporting human data that showed no correlation between the presence of anti-FHA antibodies and protection against household exposure to B. pertussis [10,11]. Other murine studies have shown that FHA is protective [12,13].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There has been considerable debate whether FHA can confer protection against B. pertussis infection. Some murine studies have indicated that FHA is not protective [8,9], supporting human data that showed no correlation between the presence of anti-FHA antibodies and protection against household exposure to B. pertussis [10,11]. Other murine studies have shown that FHA is protective [12,13].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Earlier work by Sato et al . [8] and Sato and Sato [9] questioned the protective efficacy of FHA. In addition, Cherry et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This latter observation has been confirmed by Sato et al (43). These experiments seem to show that the mouseprotecting activity of pertussis vaccine determined by the ic challenge test depends on antigens other than Ptx, although this toxin in small amounts is required (23,28,38,42). Ptx, when partially detoxified, protects mice at doses over 1,600 ng; in smaller nonprotective doses, Ptx acts as an adjuvant to other surface antigens of B. pertussis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Detoxified Ptx has been selected as one of the components in these vaccines because it protects mice against intracerebral (ic) and aerosol induced infections with virulent B. pertussis (22,41,42,47), and because the toxin has been postulated to be responsible for the symptomatology of whooping cough (20,32,33,47). Furthermore, the mouse protection test, which employs the ic challenge (16), is a required test in various countries for determining the protective potency of pertussis vaccines (20,31), and vaccines without Ptx do not induce adequate protection against ic challenge in mice (23,28,38).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The heparin binding activity of FHA may allow B. pertussis to bind to non-ciliated cells as demonstrated using WiDr cells, HeLa cells, and Vero cells [89,90], or perhaps facilitate interactions with the ECM. The lectin-like binding of FHA to heparin and dextran sulfate was character-ised when it was shown that binding to epithelial cells could be inhibited by the addition of heparin [91].…”
Section: Binding Activitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%