Background: Treatments on middle cerebral arterial occlusions (MCAO) remain controversial. This study aims at investigating efficacies of surgical revascularizations in young and middle-aged patients (aged 18-65 y) with symptomatic MCAO, and making comparisons between surgical procedures.Methods: From a seven-year prospective consecutive registry, 115 cases were enrolled in this study. Patient individually received medical therapy alone (medical group, n=64) and medical therapy plus direct or indirect revascularization (surgical group, n=51). The secondary ischemic events (SIE) was defined as the primary outcome. SIE incidences and SIE-free survival rates were compared between groups. Risk factors were analyzed using the Cox regression analysis.Results: During a follow-up of 42.7 months on average, SIE occurred in 11cases of medical group and 10 cases of surgical group. SIE incidences were indifferent between groups (surgical:medical = 19.6%:17%, P=0.810, 95%CI 0.455-3.034). SIE incidences were 29.4% and 0% in direct revascularization subgroup and indirect revascularization subgroup, respectively. Indirect revascularization induced a higher SIE-free survival rate than direct revascularization (Log-rank P=0.015) and medical therapy (Log-rank P=0.044). An age>43y, with concomitant intracerebral arterial stenosis, and hyperlipidaemia history were correlated to the occurrence of SIE, while presences of compensatory arteries and taking antihypertensive drugs reduced risks of SIE.Conclusions: Indirect revascularization plus medical therapy was suggested to be more effective on SIE prevention than both medical treatments alone and direct revascularization plus medical therapy in young and middle aged patients with symptomatic MCAO. Direct revascularization was not recommended, for its similar efficacy to medical therapy alone.