2019
DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.00015.2019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of AMP-activated protein kinase in sepsis-induced cardiovascular dysfunction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Previously, strategies to inhibit FASN and activate AMPK have been demonstrated to have beneficial effects in experimental models of sepsis and endotoxaemia. 21,26,41 In our study, none of the strategies was able to ameliorate LPS-induced cardiac dysfunction,…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previously, strategies to inhibit FASN and activate AMPK have been demonstrated to have beneficial effects in experimental models of sepsis and endotoxaemia. 21,26,41 In our study, none of the strategies was able to ameliorate LPS-induced cardiac dysfunction,…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…Previously, strategies to inhibit FASN and activate AMPK have been demonstrated to have beneficial effects in experimental models of sepsis and endotoxaemia 21,26,41 . In our study, none of the strategies was able to ameliorate LPS‐induced cardiac dysfunction, although, in the case of FASN inhibition, mitochondrial FAO and overall cardiac fatty acid metabolism were substantially improved.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…Submitted 13 February 2019; accepted in final form 13 February 2019 TO THE EDITOR: We thank Angé and colleagues for their interest in our study comparing the manifestation of sepsis-induced cardiac injury in young and mature mice and the underlying molecular age-dependent differences of AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) regulation (4). We appreciate the valuable and constructive comments pointed in their Letter to the Editor (1).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%