Metrics & MoreArticle RecommendationsI n their critical review, 1 Su, Smets, and coauthors extensively summarized studies on the role played by ammoniaoxidizing bacteria (AOB) in organic micropollutant (OMP) transformation using three levels of evidence: molecular, cellular, and community. They also comprehensively covered the abiotic reactions with the N-species formed from nitrification. We agree with the authors that some studies do support the important role played by AOB in the transformation of specific OMPs. However, we find that the authors' conclusion, "AOB are the main drivers of OMP biotransformation during wastewater treatment processes" (p 2173), does not stand up to proper scientific scrutiny. In the following, we will present our main arguments and provide the overlooked evidence contradicting the authors' conclusion. (In the following, all page numbers and references to graphical elements refer to Su et al. 2020. 1 ) Molecular Level. One argument the authors used to demonstrate the dominance of AOB in OMP biotransformation was that many observed OMP biotransformation reactions could be catalyzed by AOB, including (1) hydroxylation, (2) O-dealkylation, (3) thioester oxidation, (4) dehydrogenation, and (5) nitration. However, except for nitration, all these reactions may also be catalyzed by enzymes other than ammonia monooxygenase (AMO), including monooxygenases, dioxygenases and other oxidoreductases from heterotrophs. 2,3 Many of those enzymes commonly occur in activated sludge communities. 4,5 Thus, detecting the same transformation products in sludge communities as in AOB pure cultures does not provide conclusive evidence for the dominant role of AOB in oxidative biotransformation of OMPs in wastewater treatment.Cellular Level. The authors state that OMPs exhibiting