2011
DOI: 10.1063/1.3525799
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of adsorption effects on absolute electron-molecule cross-section calibration using the relative flow technique

Abstract: In this work, we report an experimental investigation on relative flow-rate determination for vapors. The mechanism of adsorption-desorption of vapors on surfaces is considered. In contrast to previous investigations, our study shows that the adsorption of vapors on surfaces may significantly affect the flow-rate determination and consequently the measured cross sections. Particularly, for water, it can result in an overestimation of 35% in the cross sections.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
35
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The DCS was measured using the same experimental setup and procedure presented in several previous works [14][15][16][17][18][19][20], Briefly, the intensities of the elastically scattered electrons were measured using a crossed electron-beam-molecularbeam geometry. The scattered electrons are energy filtered by a retarding-field energy analyzer with a resolution of about 1.5 eV.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The DCS was measured using the same experimental setup and procedure presented in several previous works [14][15][16][17][18][19][20], Briefly, the intensities of the elastically scattered electrons were measured using a crossed electron-beam-molecularbeam geometry. The scattered electrons are energy filtered by a retarding-field energy analyzer with a resolution of about 1.5 eV.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each measurement, approximately 1 mL of the liquid sample was put into a small vial attached to the gas-handling manifold [14] and then underwent a pretreatment for elimination of atmo spheric air through several freeze-thaw cycles. A gaseous DMS beam was formed by the saturated vapor above the liquid, and its purity was checked during the measurements using a resid ual gas analyzer attached to the electron spectrometer chamber.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the closed volume is constant, we can assume that the pressure rise over time (measured by an MKS Baratron) is proportional to the outflow of vapors from the sample container. Here, it should be noted that for vapors, unlike for gaseous targets (e.g., Ar), effects such as adsorption on surfaces may significantly affect the flow rate determination and consequently the absolute differential cross sections, which have been investigated in detail recently by Homem et al [25]. However, the influence of these effects was strongly reduced in the present case because the whole system (sample, pipes, valves, and needle) was heated, as also pointed out in [25].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, it should be noted that for vapors, unlike for gaseous targets (e.g., Ar), effects such as adsorption on surfaces may significantly affect the flow rate determination and consequently the absolute differential cross sections, which have been investigated in detail recently by Homem et al [25]. However, the influence of these effects was strongly reduced in the present case because the whole system (sample, pipes, valves, and needle) was heated, as also pointed out in [25]. Indeed, we have compared flow rates of NMF vapors measured at room temperature and when the gas line was maintained at 50 • -60 • , under the same pressures behind the needle, the results showed a non-negligible difference.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relative flow rate has been determined by closing an outlet to the chamber, admitting target gases into a closed constant volume and then measuring the pressure increase in time (measured by a MKS baratron). 8,10 The influence of adsorption on surfaces to the relative flow measurements 37 is reduced in the present case, because the furan molecule has a very high vapor pressure and a small dipole moment (see also Ref. 37).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 90%