1994
DOI: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1994.tb14032.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role of adhesion glycoproteins CD 18 and intercellular adhesion molecule‐1 in complement‐mediated reactions of rabbit skin

Abstract: The role of the adhesion glycoproteins CD 18 and intercellular adhesion molecule‐1 (ICAM‐1) in inflammatory responses produced during a reversed passive Arthus (RPA) reaction and induced by zymosan and zymosan‐activated plasma (ZAP) were studied in rabbit skin. Oedema formation and haemorrhage were quantified by measuring accumulation of 125I‐albumin and 111In‐labelled red blood cells (111In‐RBC) respectively. Monoclonal antibody (mAb) R15.7 (anti‐CD18), administered intravenously, abolished accumulation of 12… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…injection of inflammatory mediators such as FMLP or C5a in rabbit skin induces oedema formation which is abrogated when circulating neutrophils are depleted (Wedmore & Williams, 1981b;Hellewell et al, 1989) or when neutrophil accumulation is inhibited by pretreatment with mAbs that recognize the CD1 1/CD1 8 integrins on the surface of the neutrophil (Afors et al, 1987;Norman et al, 1994). Similarly, in rat and rabbit skin, oedema formation and haemorrhage in a cutaneous RPA reaction are dependent on neutrophils (Mulligan et al, 1992b;Norman et al, 1994). Our results obtained in investigating the neutrophil-------------dependency and the mechanisms involved in a RPA reaction in guinea-pig skin can be summarized as follows: (1) Most oedema formation in the RPA reaction occurred over the first 60 min whereas "'In-neutrophil accumulation was still rising from 60 to 240 min.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…injection of inflammatory mediators such as FMLP or C5a in rabbit skin induces oedema formation which is abrogated when circulating neutrophils are depleted (Wedmore & Williams, 1981b;Hellewell et al, 1989) or when neutrophil accumulation is inhibited by pretreatment with mAbs that recognize the CD1 1/CD1 8 integrins on the surface of the neutrophil (Afors et al, 1987;Norman et al, 1994). Similarly, in rat and rabbit skin, oedema formation and haemorrhage in a cutaneous RPA reaction are dependent on neutrophils (Mulligan et al, 1992b;Norman et al, 1994). Our results obtained in investigating the neutrophil-------------dependency and the mechanisms involved in a RPA reaction in guinea-pig skin can be summarized as follows: (1) Most oedema formation in the RPA reaction occurred over the first 60 min whereas "'In-neutrophil accumulation was still rising from 60 to 240 min.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We could not measure "'Inneutrophils in experiments with 6.5E whole mAb since it has been previously shown to enhance the clearance of radiolabelled leukocytes from the circulation . Similarly, anti-CD18 treatment in rabbits and rats has been shown to inhibit not only neutrophil accumulation and haemorrhage, but also oedema formation (Mulligan et al, 1992b;Norman et at., 1994). Thus, in guinea-pig skin, oedema formation in a RPA reaction is partially neutrophildependent, at least measured over 4 h. It is possible that oedema formation measured at later periods (7 to 48 h) may also be dependent on neutrophils as suggested by Humphrey (1955b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The RPA reaction and the LSR have, however, been demonstrated to be complement-and neutrophil-dependent (Stetson & Good, 1951; Humphrey, 1955;Cochrane & Janoff, 1974;Yeh et al, 1991;Rossi et al, 1992). Furthermore, the Arthus reaction Noonan et al, 1993;Norman et al, 1994;Teixeira et al, 1994) and the LSR (Argenbright & Barton 1991;1992) are inhibited by i.v. administration of mAbs directed against the leucocyte adhesion molecule CD18 and the predominantly endothelial cell adhesion molecule, intercellular adhesion molecule-i (ICAM-1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%