1970
DOI: 10.1037/h0028613
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role modelship and interaction in adolescence and young adulthood.

Abstract: Investigations of role modelship usually fail to make differentiations within the global concept of role model. They often give attention to only one aspect of the identification process, and often do not distinguish between role modelship and role model-subject interaction. The present study calls attention to this imprecision and explores the relations between these various parameters of the interpersonal encounter. It was found that the educational, occupational, and personal spheres of role modelship and i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In interviews with 101 males over a 10-year period of their lives (from age 15-25), Bell (1970) found that most role models exerted influence over only one of the three "spheres of life" (educational, occupational, or personal; p. 123). He also found that there were three different ways in which identification with a role model could be described: "perceived similarity with the role model, imitation of the role model, and assimilation of the role model's attitudes and values" (p. 123).…”
Section: Role Models the Nature Of Role Model Relationshipsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In interviews with 101 males over a 10-year period of their lives (from age 15-25), Bell (1970) found that most role models exerted influence over only one of the three "spheres of life" (educational, occupational, or personal; p. 123). He also found that there were three different ways in which identification with a role model could be described: "perceived similarity with the role model, imitation of the role model, and assimilation of the role model's attitudes and values" (p. 123).…”
Section: Role Models the Nature Of Role Model Relationshipsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Role identification can be seen as a cognitive response to an individual's belief that the characteristics of another person (the model) are close to his/her own motives and character (Kagan, 1958) and that this other person plays a desirable -often central -social role or occupies an attractive position (Bell, 1970). Identification may result in the formation or adaptation of an individual's preferences (Witt, 1991) or in imitative behavior if this is 2 Role models may not only promote or influence people to select a similar career ("positive" role model).…”
Section: Definition and Functions Of Role Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, role models may also enhance the desire to Consistent with these role and model aspects, the phenomenon of role models is explained by theories of (role) identification and social learning (Gibson, 2003;. Role identification can be seen as a cognitive response to an individual's belief that the characteristics of another person (the model) are close to his/her own motives and character (Kagan, 1958) and that this other person plays a desirable -often central -social role or occupies an attractive position (Bell, 1970). Identification may result in the formation or adaptation of an individual's preferences (Witt, 1991) …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, persons may be more likely to conform with behavioural norms through modelling of others' behaviours, when the persons perceive similarities and can identify with the role models. 9 10 Likewise, bridging social capital may yield health benefits through these mechanisms as a result of acquired assets and information stemming from dissimilarities between individuals. For instance, communities high in bridging social capital that aim to improve local services may conceivably access a wide range of informational resources, 2 and achieve strong political influence through the sociodemographic and socioeconomic diversity of its social networks.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%