Role- and Relationship-Based Identity Management for Private yet Accountable E-Learning

Anwar, Mohd; Greer, Jim

doi:10.1007/978-0-387-09428-1_22

Cited by 10 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…As long as privacy is at risk in these environments, user confidence is reduced and information sharing/disclosure behaviour is limited (Anwar, 2021). To ensure that the learning environment is secure, the privacy of the students is guaranteed (Anwar & Greer, 2012). The effectiveness and implementation of online learning is directly dependent on students' perceptions/knowledge of environmental safety and how they respond to occurring violations (Ali & Zafar, 2017).…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Because they encounter real identity breaches in online environments (Borcea‐Pfitzmann et al, 2005), students may face the use of multiple identities due to privacy concerns (Anwar et al, 2006). In fact, the use of identities may vary from context to context (Anwar & Greer, 2012). In face‐to‐face classes, our facial expressions, tone of voice and body movements should not threaten the freedom of the other person.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

University students' digital spaces in online learning communities: Implications for understanding, protecting and maintaining privacy

Özer Şanal,

Çiçek

2023

Brit J Educational Tech

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In addition to learning effectively and effectively in online learning communities (OLCs), students must be in a secure environment and privacy must be respected. The study aimed to identify privacy violations that university students encounter in OLCs, and identify recommendations and some strategies to implement to ensure privacy at the OLC. A qualitative research method was applied in the study. First, focus group interviews were conducted with a total of 108 students who participated actively in the OLC. After analysing the interview data, a privacy violations report (RPV‐OLC) was prepared at the OLC. According to the RPV‐OLC, a problem description for the Delphi technique was designed and 17 experts were identified for the interview. Delphi panels with experts were completed in 5 months. The content analysis process was used for the data obtained. Students said they encountered information sharing and access, access to information, system/course settings, resistance to negotiations, communication problems and lack of knowledge. On the other hand, experts suggest that different suggestions and strategies could be implemented to ensure privacy in the OLC, such as partial privacy, mutual trust, contextual privacy agreements, role‐based or anonymous identity use, and privacy education. The study focused on defining the concept of privacy and student privacy violations in online learning environments and providing solutions for educators, students and system administrators. Practitioner notesWhat is already known about this topic Digital learning environments pose a threat to the privacy of students. The fact that privacy violations in the OLC can trigger concerns among students has a negative impact on learning processes. There is high interest at the moment in how to plan the most effective teaching in online learning environments—but privacy is being neglected. What this paper adds This article explains the privacy violations university students encounter at the OLC. This document contains guidelines on how to mitigate and prevent privacy violations in OLC. The results of the study also provide suggestions for privacy protection at the OLC. Implications for practice and/or policy It is important that the instructors who participate in the OLC are informed about the necessary measures, rules, principles, activities and follow‐up measures to protect their personal privacy. If we can overcome students' concerns about privacy violations at the OLC, we can create more comfortable learning spaces. The aim of learning should not only be to peak performance; the most important responsibility of educators or system administrators is to preserve each student's private space, while at the same time achieving the best performance.

show abstract

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

University students' digital spaces in online learning communities: Implications for understanding, protecting and maintaining privacy

Özer Şanal,

Çiçek

2023

Brit J Educational Tech

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This early work includes some of the elements found in more recent work by Mohd Anwar and Jim in user-controlled identity management that makes it possible for users to control the type of information that will be shared depending on the context of the interaction. This approach allows for privacy customization in terms of purposes, roles, and relationships (Anwar and Greer 2012b). Anwar and Greer (2012a) describe an approach to facilitating trust by allowing the use of multiple identities as a mechanism for secure reputation transfer.…”

Section: Privacy and Data Securitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Open Student Modeling Research and its Connections to Educational Assessment

Zapata‐Rivera

2020

Int J Artif Intell Educ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Research in the area of Open Student Models (OSMs) has shown that external representations of the student model can be used to facilitate educational processes such as student reflection, knowledge awareness, learning, collaboration, negotiation, and student model diagnosis. OSMs can be integrated into existing learning systems or become a framework for the creation of learning systems. This paper discusses how early work with Jim Greer in the area of open student modeling has inspired and continues to inspire a line of research on innovative assessments and the design and evaluation of score report systems that are used to share assessment/student modeling information with various educational stakeholders to support learning. Several projects are discussed as well as their connections to my work with Jim while working at the ARIES laboratory.

show abstract

“…The role-and relationship-based identity management system proposed by Anwar and Greer [7] for the e-learning domain uses public roles to assigned guarantor privileges and facilitate usage control over disclosed information. Maler [13] proposed a federated identity management system using widely deployed solutions of Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) and Liberty Alliance standards.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Research in Techniques of Personal Identity Management

Liu¹,

Ping²,

Sun³

et al. 2012

2012 International Conference on Control Engineering and Communication Technology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper proposed a model of 7-Phase Personal Identity Management Cycle which capture important actors and events that happen around the management issues of a personal identity. This paper explained the purpose of each phase, the actors and the conditions involved in transition between phases. Examples and scenarios are also provided to give illustrations how this model can be used to address different issues in Identity Fraud.

show abstract

Role- and Relationship-Based Identity Management for Private yet Accountable E-Learning

Cited by 10 publications

References 6 publications

University students' digital spaces in online learning communities: Implications for understanding, protecting and maintaining privacy

University students' digital spaces in online learning communities: Implications for understanding, protecting and maintaining privacy

Open Student Modeling Research and its Connections to Educational Assessment

Research in Techniques of Personal Identity Management

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About