Rola poakcesyjnych migracji zagranicznych w zmianach przestrzennych układów zaludnienia w Polsce w latach 2004–2012

Gałka, Jadwiga

doi:10.25167/sm2018.029.03

Cited by 3 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…According to Zdrojewski (1995) [54], Szyma ńska and Biega ńska (2010) [55], Rosner (2012) [30], and Rosner and Stanny (2014) [56], demographic potential is described by population size, population density, and population structure based on age and sex, and it is determined by natural population increase and net migration (components of real growth). The age-sex structure of a population is a cumulative result of fertility, mortality, immigration, and emigration [57][58][59][60][61][62]. In a broader sense, it also accounts for education and occupational structure [63,64].…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Natural increase and net migration can be positive or negative. The influence of natural increase and net migration on real growth in the analyzed areas was investigated with the use of the method proposed by J. W. Webb (1964) [4,31,62,[70][71][72][73][74] (Table 4). The above procedure was applied to illustrate the combined influence of natural increase and net migration on real growth at LAU 1 units.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Differences in the Quantitative Demographic Potential—A Comparative Study of Polish–German and Polish–Lithuanian Transborder Regions

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Demographic potential is a particularly important consideration in border areas that are peripheral regions of a country. The aim of this study was to identify differences in the quantitative demographic potential of Polish–German and Polish–Lithuanian transborder regions, as well as the extent to which natural population increase and net migration influence the demographic potential of border regions. An essential element of the research was the analysis of the importance of borders on shaping the quantitative demographic potential. The study relied on the zeroed unitarization method and the method proposed by Webb. The study revealed considerable spatial variation in the quantitative demographic potential of the analyzed regions at LAU 1 (Local Administrative Units) on the background of NUTS 0 (Nomenclature of Territorial Units for Statistics) and NUTS 2. The highest values were noted in urban units, which accounted for 11.0% of all evaluated units. The areas characterized by the lowest demographic potential represented 16.5% of the total number of the analyzed units, which should be regarded as a positive outcome. Most of these border regions were situated in Germany and Lithuania. Demographic potential is an important determinant of social and economic growth; therefore, the results of this study can be used to diagnose problems in border regions and implement the required regional policies.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Differences in the Quantitative Demographic Potential—A Comparative Study of Polish–German and Polish–Lithuanian Transborder Regions

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Ostatecznie prowadzi to do tzw. "rozlewania się" obszarów miejskich (Bagiński, 2011;Gałka, Warych-Juras, 2011). W konsekwencji obszary podmiejskie, tj.…”

Section: Wstępunclassified

Procesy demograficzne w miejskich obszarach funkcjonalnych w Polsce

Szafranek-Stefaniuk

2024

Czasopismo Geograficzne

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Procesy demograficzne zachodzą współcześnie w Polsce z coraz większą intensywnością, stanowiąc efekt oraz czynnik kształtowania pozostałych sfer funkcjonowania jednostek terytorialnych. Zjawisko to dotyczy również miejskich obszarów funkcjonalnych (MOF), w których miasto centralne (rdzeń) jest silnie powiązane funkcjonalnie z otoczeniem, na które składają się obszary wiejskie i małe miasta. Celem artykułu jest zbadanie zakresu, kierunków i tempa zmian procesów demograficznych w MOF w latach 2014–2022. Ponadto dążono do wskazania typów demograficznych badanych MOF-ów. W badaniach wzięto do analizy 24 MOF-y, rozumiane jako jednostki sformalizowane w formie związków Zintegrowanych Inwestycji Terytorialnych (ZIT). Zastosowano metody teoretyczne i empiryczne, mieszane, tj. jakościowe i ilościowe. Punktem wyjścia była krytyczna analiza piśmiennictwa, a wymiar praktyczny badań oparto na metodach opisu statystycznego, przede wszystkim zastosowano analizę struktury obiektów oraz analizę dynamiki zjawisk. Wykorzystano metody opisowe, porównawcze oraz klasyfikacyjne. Badania oparto na wyselekcjonowanych wskaźnikach statystycznych pozyskanych powinno być: z baz danych BDL i Strateg z zasobów Głównego Urzędu Statystycznego (GUS). Uzyskane wyniki wskazują, że w analizowanym okresie zachodziły istotne zmiany demograficzne w MOF-ach, w tym m.in. wzrost zaludnienia, niekorzystne tendencje w zakresie ruchu naturalnego skutkujące starzeniem się społeczeństwa, napływ migracyjny w ruchu wewnętrznym. Ponadto ustalono, że odmiennie kształtują się procesy demograficzne w obszarach funkcjonalnych największych miast i miast subregionalnych. Wzrastała liczba ludności MOF ukształtowanych wokół największych miast i była ona generowana przede wszystkim dodatnim bilansem migracyjnym, natomiast zmniejszało się zaludnienie większości MOF miast subregionalnych, głównie ze względu na ubytek w ruchu naturalnym.

show abstract

“…Znajdują się tutaj publikacje dotyczące emigracji w okresie PRL (Runge, 1991), w tym konsekwentnie rozwijana i uszczegóławiana seria monogrfaii Eberhardta (2000Eberhardta ( , 2006Eberhardta ( , 2010Eberhardta ( , 2017, wyjazdów w okresie transformacji na początku lat 90. XX w. (Długosz, 2007) oraz po wejściu Polski do Unii Europejskiej w 2004 r. (Zborowski i Gałka, 2008;Śleszyński, 2013b;Gałka, 2017Gałka, , 2018, przy czym najbardziej interesująca dla badaczy jest skala tych przemieszczeń oraz ich kierunki (np. Jończy i Rokita-Poskart, 2016).…”

Section: Migracje Zewnętrzne (Emigracja I Imigracja Zagraniczna)unclassified

Geograficzne badania migracji w Polsce po 1989 r. = Geographical research on migration in Poland after 1989

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article summarises a review of geographical studies on migration published in Poland after 1989, as also included in the Report of the Polish Academy of Sciences’ Migration Research Committee (Komitet Badań nad Migracjami) (Horolets et al., 2018). The work identifies around 750 bibliographical items from the years 1990‑2017, which it proves possible to assign to the categories of: the theory and methodology of geographical research into migration (including modelling and forecasting), internal migrations, external migrations (emigration and immigration), studies concerning foreign territories, research into migration historically (pre-WW2), and work concerning migration’s influence and impact on regional and local development. As is clear, no attention has been paid to issues of daily mobility (commutes to work or school), tourism (be that recreational, or related to business or pilgrimage), or to longer-term matters relating to ethnicity or multiculturalism. The review has also been supplemented to inclde work from the latest (2016‑2020) period. The studies that have been run prove to be of an empirical nature first and foremost, associated with the statistical and cartographic identification and description of observed phenomena and processes. This identification is most often based on secondary data from Statistics Poland – which deals with the ongoing processing of new registrations in the country, as well as deregistration. It seems that these data have been accepted more or less uncritically by most geographers, at least until recently. As the strands of research represented least abundantly are modelling, as well contributions to theory, this needs to be seen as marked regression in comparison with the situation in the 1970s – marking the zenith of Polish geographical work on migrations (or indeed more broadly on the processes of population and settlement). Set against the background of other disciplines, this denotes further a very large number of studies identified as geographical but not equating automatically to progress of a conceptual or theoretical nature. In contrast, a plus-point where the comparison is with typically statistical or demographic research, or partly even that of a sociological and economic nature, is a very good level of” feeling for/sensitivity to the space” (and hence familiarity with local factors), that allows us to avoid over-averaging or generalization in the direction of aggregate territories known to be too heterogeneous (not least the voivodeships into which Poland has long been divided at provincial – latterly provincial/regional – level). Avoided in this way is resort to over-generalised cognitive impacts in essence straying beyond the boundaries of geography into other disciplines. The main and most-original achievements of post-1989 geographical research can be seen to include:•multi-regional modelling of the dynamics to population change that takes account of the complexity of migration processes; •a particularly exhaustive and comprehensive reconnaissance and treatment of the migration-related specifics of the Opole-Silesia region;•work on the role played by migration (and mobility more broadly) in the development of suburban zones and metropolitan areas;•in-depth research into the linkage between migration and local or regional socioeconomic development;•a contribution to the classification, typology, delimitation and indication of migration, as well as the deployment of indicators in procedures of this type, in a context that is broader where scientific disciplines are concerned;•the empirical indication of population over- or under-estimates in different configurations of space as a reflection of unregistered migrations;•contributions to urbanisation theory including as regards the relations pertaining between migrations and the settlement system.

show abstract

Rola poakcesyjnych migracji zagranicznych w zmianach przestrzennych układów zaludnienia w Polsce w latach 2004–2012

Cited by 3 publications

References 3 publications

Differences in the Quantitative Demographic Potential—A Comparative Study of Polish–German and Polish–Lithuanian Transborder Regions

Differences in the Quantitative Demographic Potential—A Comparative Study of Polish–German and Polish–Lithuanian Transborder Regions

Procesy demograficzne w miejskich obszarach funkcjonalnych w Polsce

Geograficzne badania migracji w Polsce po 1989 r. = Geographical research on migration in Poland after 1989

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About