Proceedings 2006 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2006. ICRA 2006.
DOI: 10.1109/robot.2006.1642296
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ROKVISS - robotics component verification on ISS current experimental results on parameter identification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There have been six projects on space robots so far (Hirzinger et al, 1994;Settelmeyer et al, 1997;Cusumano et al, 2004;Albu-Schaffer et al, 2006;Landzettel et al, 2006;Preusche et al, 2006), three of which conducted on-orbit demonstrations. At present, two representative projects are underway, the DOES project and the OLEV project.…”
Section: Germanymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been six projects on space robots so far (Hirzinger et al, 1994;Settelmeyer et al, 1997;Cusumano et al, 2004;Albu-Schaffer et al, 2006;Landzettel et al, 2006;Preusche et al, 2006), three of which conducted on-orbit demonstrations. At present, two representative projects are underway, the DOES project and the OLEV project.…”
Section: Germanymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main difficulty is to achieve a real-time communication infrastructure capable of long lasting communication windows while keeping moderate delays. The point-to-point paradigm was first presented during the ROKVISS experiment [2], where high performance teleoperation could be achieved with relative ease due to the resulting low time delays (around 20 ms) and low jitter. The used infrastructure allowed fast (500 Hz) real-time communication between the DLR, close to Munich, and the ISS Russian module.…”
Section: Teleoperation Through Geostationary Satellitesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the development of human-robot cooperation, force sensing and force control are increasingly demanded in order to achieve compliant contact force and high safety, which necessitate joint torque measuring in robot systems [1][2][3]. Meanwhile, control strategies with joint torque feedback have been presented to deal with robot vibration and motion error caused by the inherent flexibility, dynamic error in tooth engagement and complex friction in harmonic drive, so as to achieve better trajectory tracking performance, which also spur the usage of joint torque sensor [4][5][6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%