Roentgenographic and direct observation of experimental lesions in bone: I

Bender, I.B.; Seltzer, Samuel

doi:10.14219/jada.archive.1961.0030

Cited by 298 publications

(186 citation statements)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

177

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Also, studies show that intraoral periapical radiographs are utilized for many years to determine the apical periodontitis (16). On the other hand, it was revealed that periapical lesions may only be observed on radiographs when periapical radiolucency is getting nearly 30% -50% of mineral bone loss (17). Furthermore, different factors could impact on radiography detection of periapical lesions such as : surrounding bone density, X-ray angulations and contrast (18), position of tooth (19) and the three-dimensional figure of the lesion (20).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Using Periapical Radiography to Differentiate Periapical Granuloma and Radicular Cysts

Farhadi¹,

Mirinezhad²,

Zarandi³

2016

Avicenna J Dent Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: The distinction between radicular cysts and apical granulomas is important in treatment decision. Objectives: The current study aimed to differentiate these two lesions based on radiography images. Patients and Methods:The material consisted of 138 radiographs obtained using Kodak E -speed, in patients aged 29 to 47, divided into two groups: 109 granulomas and 29 radicular cysts. Size of radiography images was measured; the tooth then was extracted and examined in pathologist lab. The results were analyzed by SPSS.15 and ROC curve was created to find cut-off point to differentiate periapical granuloma and radicular cysts.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Using Periapical Radiography to Differentiate Periapical Granuloma and Radicular Cysts

Farhadi¹,

Mirinezhad²,

Zarandi³

2016

Avicenna J Dent Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…However, in such cases, conventional radiographs have limitations primarily because of the inherent projection of a 3D anatomy into a 2D image, which leads to superimposition, geometric distortion of the image, and hence misinterpretation and/or misdiagnosis. 6,7 Tachibana and Matsumoto 8 found that CT allowed multidirectional observation of the morphology of roots, root canals, and the tooth. The newer 3D diagnostic technology of SCT allows to obtain a large volume of data in seconds and offers more rapid examination time with the effective dose in the range of 1 to 30 mSv, which is much less than conventional CT. 9 In the present case, guidelines proposed by Diederichs et al 10 were used that decreased the radiation dosage to 0.56 ± 0.06 mGy, which is equivalent to a single panoramic radiograph.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Endodontic Management of a Maxillary Lateral Incisor fused with Supernumerary Tooth using Spiral Computed Tomography as Diagnostic Aid

Dua¹,

Dua²

2016

World Journal of Dentistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Fusion is a developmental anomaly in tooth morphology, which may be due to either union of two separate tooth buds or partial splitting of a single tooth bud. A thorough understanding of root canal anatomy is an essential prerequisite for a successful endodontic treatment. This case report describes successful endodontic management of a maxillary left lateral incisor fused with a supernumerary tooth using spiral computed tomography (SCT) as a diagnostic aid. A patient reported with a painless swelling in the maxillary anterior region associated with a fused maxillary lateral incisor. Spiral CT was performed to better understand the complex root canal anatomy. Endodontic treatment was done using methyl trioxide aggregate (MTA) as apical plug and obturation by thermoplasticized gutta-percha. The tooth was completely asymptomatic at 1-year follow-up showing signs of healing. The present case report emphasizes on the importance of three-dimensional (3D) imaging techniques, such as SCT in cases of developmental anomalies having complicated root canal morphology for successful endodontic therapy.

show abstract

“…Sensitivity was recorded by Barthel et al [13] to be as low as 35%, while Brynolf [12] and Green et al [14] recorded it to be as high as 88% and 66% respectively. Factors affecting sensitivity were all related to the relative mineral tissue loss including; the extent of the lesion [15], inflammation [16], thickness of the overlying cortical bone [17], and superimposition of the lesion by other anatomical structures.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Post-Treatment Radiographic and Clinical Evaluation of Matched-Taper Single-Cone versus Warm Vertical Compaction Technique: a One-Year Follow up Study

Atteia¹

2015

JDHODT

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Roentgenographic and direct observation of experimental lesions in bone: I

Cited by 298 publications

References 3 publications

Using Periapical Radiography to Differentiate Periapical Granuloma and Radicular Cysts

Using Periapical Radiography to Differentiate Periapical Granuloma and Radicular Cysts

Endodontic Management of a Maxillary Lateral Incisor fused with Supernumerary Tooth using Spiral Computed Tomography as Diagnostic Aid

Post-Treatment Radiographic and Clinical Evaluation of Matched-Taper Single-Cone versus Warm Vertical Compaction Technique: a One-Year Follow up Study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About