2017
DOI: 10.3855/jidc.8271
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rodents and other small mammal reservoirs in plague foci in northeastern Brazil

Abstract: Introduction: Plague is an acute, infectious zoonotic disease, primarily of wild rodents and their fleas, that affects humans and other mammals. In Brazil, several plague foci are located in the northeast region. Plague surveillance based on monitoring of rodents was discontinued in 2007, and the current information on rodent populations is unsatisfactory. Our purpose was to update the information on rodents and other small mammals in plague foci in northeastern Brazil. Methodology: Nine surveys in the h… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Practically since the arrival of the plague in Brazil in 1899, during the third pandemic, a surveillance and control program adjusted to the epidemiological situation, ecological and demographic characteristics and scientific and technological conditions has been carried out [7,10,17]. For several decades, the rodents were trapped for detection of the plague bacillus and/or antiplague antibodies [22][23][24]. The surveys among the rodents were discontinued in 2007 due to new evidences that serological survey of plague antibodies among roaming-dogs is a more efficient and cost effective tool for plague surveillance [17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Practically since the arrival of the plague in Brazil in 1899, during the third pandemic, a surveillance and control program adjusted to the epidemiological situation, ecological and demographic characteristics and scientific and technological conditions has been carried out [7,10,17]. For several decades, the rodents were trapped for detection of the plague bacillus and/or antiplague antibodies [22][23][24]. The surveys among the rodents were discontinued in 2007 due to new evidences that serological survey of plague antibodies among roaming-dogs is a more efficient and cost effective tool for plague surveillance [17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data on rodent collection was obtained by consulting the original documents available at the Nacional Reference Service of Plague (Serviço de Referencia Nacional de Peste: SRP) from the Institute Aggeu Magalhães (IAM), FIOCRUZ PE located at Recife, PE, Brazil. Animal capture and handling methods were performed as previously described [18][19][20][21][22][23].…”
Section: 2data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A distinct cut-off was calculated for each peroxidase conjugate. Since the rodent samples included rather heterogeneous range of wild species [21], we could not test them for IgG-ELISA.…”
Section: Ethics Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The copyright holder for this this version posted September 23, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.09.21.21263536 doi: medRxiv preprint evaluate the agreement between the Protein A and IgG methods in ELISA. All sera were kindly provided by the Brazilian Plague Reference Service (SRP) and originated from the routine surveillance of the Brazilian plague areas including human cases, several rodent species and domestic carnivores (stray dogs) that pray on rodents [21,22].…”
Section: Human and Animal Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could be because many diseased cats do not survive the infection, while dogs are more resistant and more likely to recover 10 . Because it was assumed that plague antibody detection is more sensitive in dogs than in cats and rodents, the plague surveillance of cats was discontinued in the Brazilian foci areas 24 . Despite the low antibody-positive prevalence (< 1%) during the study period (with the exception of 1997 and 2001), cats tested antibody-positive in all years investigated.…”
Section: Yearmentioning
confidence: 99%