2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2012.11.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rocking response and overturning criteria for free standing rigid blocks to single—lobe pulses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
47
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These studies showed that, in contrast with the response to a single pulse, the response to more irregular but simplified accelerograms is very sensitive to the geometrical parameters of the block, as well as to the details of ground motions and the coefficient of restitution. These results allowed increased attention to various sorts of impulses or harmonic shaking and to relationships between pulses magnitude and toppling [58][59][60][61].…”
Section: Free-vibrations Harmonic Pulses and Real Accelerogramsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies showed that, in contrast with the response to a single pulse, the response to more irregular but simplified accelerograms is very sensitive to the geometrical parameters of the block, as well as to the details of ground motions and the coefficient of restitution. These results allowed increased attention to various sorts of impulses or harmonic shaking and to relationships between pulses magnitude and toppling [58][59][60][61].…”
Section: Free-vibrations Harmonic Pulses and Real Accelerogramsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The position of the centre of mass, G, is shown in the drawing on the right in Figure 4, where hG=1190 mm is the height of G from the base section and bG=150 mm is the distance of the vertical projection of G from the nearest side of the base section in plan. A rocking-sliding model corresponding to the basic analytical and numerical simulation of the dynamic phenomenon (Shenton and Jones, 1991;Makris and Cameron, 2001;Caliò and Marletta, 2003;Borri and Grazini, 2006;Sorace and Terenzi, 2007;Baratta and Corbi, 2012;Chatzis and Smyth, 2012;Voyagaki et al 2013) was implemented for the development of the time-history analyses. As detailed in Figure 5, within this model rocking is simulated by means of a set of vertical "gap" (no-tension) interface elements linking the joints of the bottom section of the pedestal to the ground.…”
Section: Modelling Of Rocking and Sliding Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We note that the geometrically nonlinear soil-structure interaction has been studied in the past, see for instance (Kennedy et al, 1976;Nakamura et al, 2010Nakamura et al, , 2007. The concept of rocking spectra is used herein and has been extrapolated from other systems exposed to seismic risk such as base-isolated generic structures (Politopoulos, 2010), bridges (Anastasopoulos et al, 2013), masonry walls (Costa et al, 2013) or even laboratory and hospital equipment A c c e p t e d M a n u s c r i p t (Cosenza et al, 2014;Konstantinidis and Makris, 2009), free-standing blocks (Dimitrakopoulos and DeJong, 2012;Voyagaki et al, 2013) and monuments (Makris and Vassiliou, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%