2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11629-018-5286-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rockfall seismic features analysis based on in situ tests: frequency, amplitude, and duration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Now the extracting activities are stopped, and the potential collapse is dealt with by using mitigation measurements (Gigli et al 2014). A risk is also related to rockfall, for which more detailed information can be found in Feng et al (2019).…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Now the extracting activities are stopped, and the potential collapse is dealt with by using mitigation measurements (Gigli et al 2014). A risk is also related to rockfall, for which more detailed information can be found in Feng et al (2019).…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The validation of DESTRO has been done through a 2-day-long test where 90 rocks taken from the site were manually released along the slopes of Torgiovannetto quarry and recorded with two cameras and the seismic network. A detailed description of the experiment can be found in Feng et al (2019). To describe the classification capability of DESTRO, we defined three variables, true positive (TP), false positive (FP), and false negative (FN), respectively, equal to the number of rockfall correctly classified as rockfall, the number of events misclassified as rockfall, and the number of rockfalls misclassified as noise.…”
Section: Spatial Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The influence of block shape, block size and slope topography on the runout distance has been investigated only by a small number of studies (Azzoni and de Freitas, 1995;Haas et al, 2012;Fityus et al, 2013) and mainly in case studies or tests under laboratory conditions (Okura et al, 2000;Glover et al, 2015, Cui et al, 2017Wang et al, 2018;Gratchev and Saeidi, 2019). Haas et al (2012) already stated in their case study that the influence of the lithology on block shape and block size must be investigated with a broader view.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could be done e.g. in areas with different lithological settings, as the size and shape of rock fragments are determined by their lithological properties, among other influencing factors (Haas et al, 2012;Fityus et al, 2013). Some studies have described the deposition of boulders on the talus cone as gravitational sorting, where larger blocks are deposited in the distal part and smaller blocks on the upper part of the talus slope (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kirkby and Statham, 40 1975, Meißl, 1998, Agliardi and Crosta, 2003, Dorren 2003, Copons et al, 2009, Jaboyedoff and Labiouse, 2011, Frattini et al, 2012, Nappi et al, 2013, Wichmann, 2017, Volkwein et al, 2018, Caviezel et al, 2019, as well as on the measurement of rockfall activity by seismic monitoring (e.g. Vilajosana et al, 2008, Hibert et al, 2011, Farin et al, 2015, Dietze et al, 2017a, Dietze et al, 2017b, Durand et al, 2018, Feng et al, 2019. Most of these studies use LiDAR (light detection and ranging), techniques such as airborne laser scanning (ALS) as well as terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) to improve the understanding of 45 this geomorphic process (e.g.…”
Section: Introduction 25mentioning
confidence: 99%