2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11629-020-6132-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rockfall localization from seismic polarization considering multiple triaxial geophones and frequency bands

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4b). All the estimated positions are closely distributed along the real rockfall trajectory; the maximum error is impact #4 with 48.2 m, and the minimum error is impact #1 with 10.2 m. The details about this method are described in Feng et al (2020b).…”
Section: Spatial Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4b). All the estimated positions are closely distributed along the real rockfall trajectory; the maximum error is impact #4 with 48.2 m, and the minimum error is impact #1 with 10.2 m. The details about this method are described in Feng et al (2020b).…”
Section: Spatial Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a microseismic monitoring technique, signals that naturally occur within the rock mass as a consequence of internal stresses are recorded by a network of sensors that are pre-installed on the rock surface or inside the rock mass. These signals include useful information for characterizing the seismic events and can be used to extract the event onset time, location, trajectory, and volume [18][19][20][21]. In microseismic monitoring of unstable rock slopes, a large number of seismic events can be detected.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%