2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.rineng.2019.100056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rocket plume URANS simulation using OpenFOAM

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The tool used for the simulations was the software OpenFOAM v6. All the details of the numerical model can be found in the previous article [13].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The tool used for the simulations was the software OpenFOAM v6. All the details of the numerical model can be found in the previous article [13].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The physical properties related to the exhaust plume were calculated with the isentropic flow equations through a Laval nozzle. The supersonic inlet conditions were applied at the end of the nozzle of the VEGA rocket and were depicted in [13]. As the discontinuities that occur in supersonic flows affect the stability and accuracy of the calculation, it is crucial to choose a suitable solver and numerical schemes.…”
Section: Flow Conditions and Numerical Schemesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is generally admitted that the simulation can be considered at three levels of detail, Reynolds Average Navier Stokes (RANS), Large Eddy Simulation (LES), and Direct Numerical Simulations (DNS) [1] which also corresponds to different levels of precision. Both RANS and LES models can simulate typical industrial flows with the necessary accuracy and in practical computation times [2][3][4][5], but DNS is until now the only trustworthy method to investigate physical properties of flows which are little understood.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also well known that turbulent-flow simulations can be considered in terms of three levels of detail: RANS (Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes) [3], LES (large-eddy simulation) [4], and DNS (direct numerical simulation) [5,6], each of which corresponds to a different level of accuracy. Nevertheless, until now, DNS has been the only method that has been proven to be reliable for investigating the physical properties of flows that are still poorly understood.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%