1962
DOI: 10.1029/jz067i003p00929
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rocket observations of solar protons during the November 1960 events, 1

Abstract: In this paper we describe the results of three Nike‐Cajun rocket flights made during the November 12, 1960, solar proton event. By means of Geiger counter and scintillation counter measurements the spectrum of protons has been extended downward in energy to 0.2 Mev. A group of particles with energy between 0.2 and 1 Mev has been found, and it is suggested that this group may not be part of the flare‐accelerated spectrum, but may be associated with the plasma in the earth‐sun region. The spectrum in the low‐ene… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

1962
1962
1975
1975

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, if the boundary is at Ts = 8.0a, the minimum latitude attained by 500-kev protons during quiet periods is approximately ep = 69.3 0 (or L = 8.0). We note that Ogilvie, Bryant, and Daoie [1962] and Davis and Ogilvie [1962] observed protons of energies between 200 kev and 1 Mev over Churchill (geomagnetic latitude (and 1> -~Hs) relation for f = 1.3 is also shown. It seems that such an increase does not change our earlier conclusion significantly.…”
Section: Limitation Of the Earth's Magnetic Fiewsupporting
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, if the boundary is at Ts = 8.0a, the minimum latitude attained by 500-kev protons during quiet periods is approximately ep = 69.3 0 (or L = 8.0). We note that Ogilvie, Bryant, and Daoie [1962] and Davis and Ogilvie [1962] observed protons of energies between 200 kev and 1 Mev over Churchill (geomagnetic latitude (and 1> -~Hs) relation for f = 1.3 is also shown. It seems that such an increase does not change our earlier conclusion significantly.…”
Section: Limitation Of the Earth's Magnetic Fiewsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…rOckets, and satellites [Anderson and Enemark, Figure 1 gives a simplified view of effects (a) 1960; Winckler and Bhavsar, 1960;Winckler, and (b) above. Open circles represent observahavsar, and Peterson, 1961;Ogilvie et al, 1962; tions before the sudden commencement of magan Pieper et al, netic storms or during relatively quiet periods;Maehlum and O'Brien, 1962; Hofmann and closed circles represent observations during in- 'Winckler, 1963;Lin and Van Allen, 1(63) has tense storms. Confirmed the early work and has shown con-Some years before the discovery of the anomelusively that effective geomagnetic cutoffs: alous arrival of solar cosmic rays, the influence (a) are significantly less, even during mag-of a terrestrial ring current on geomagnetic eticalJY quiet periods, than those given either cutoffs had been studied theoretically by Treiman y the Stormer theory or by detailed calculation [1953) and Ray [Hl56).…”
Section: Introduction Field Derived From the Surface Values Assumingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A steepening with time has also been observed by means of rockets (OGILVIE et aL, 1962). (After AXrORD and R~D, 1962.)…”
Section: Nonperiodic Variations Of Pca Associated With Magnetic Stormsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…In part i [Ogilvie, Bryant, and Davis, 1962] we discussed the results of rocket shots during the November 12 event; here we describe the four rocket shots during the November 15 event. Nike-Cajun rockets were fired during these events to an altitude of about 130 km, each carrying two scintillation counters and a Geiger counter.…”
Section: Introduction This Paper Continues the Analysis Of The Rockementioning
confidence: 99%
“…They will be described fully by Fichtel and Guss. The details of the apparatus and method of analysis have already been described [Davis, Fichtel, Guss, and Ogilvie, 1961;Ogilvie, Bryant, and Davis, 1962], and we shall not repeat them here, since there is no difference in the method of treatment.…”
Section: Introduction This Paper Continues the Analysis Of The Rockementioning
confidence: 99%