2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2022.108351
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rock walls distribution and Holocene evolution in a mid-latitude mountain range (the Romanian Carpathians)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These pioneering studies suggest that Neogene tectonic uplift and climate warming in the Southern Carpathians drove RSF development and that periglacial, fluvial and parafluvial triggers were more important than glacial and paraglacial processes. The dominance of Early Holocene (pre‐9 ka) dated boulders in RSF deposits in particular supported these proposals (Vasile et al, 2022). Indeed, the spatio‐temporal relationships between glacial, periglacial and paraglacial landforms may indicate a deglacial/postglacial (Early Holocene) development period for RSFs.…”
Section: Landformsmentioning
confidence: 59%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…These pioneering studies suggest that Neogene tectonic uplift and climate warming in the Southern Carpathians drove RSF development and that periglacial, fluvial and parafluvial triggers were more important than glacial and paraglacial processes. The dominance of Early Holocene (pre‐9 ka) dated boulders in RSF deposits in particular supported these proposals (Vasile et al, 2022). Indeed, the spatio‐temporal relationships between glacial, periglacial and paraglacial landforms may indicate a deglacial/postglacial (Early Holocene) development period for RSFs.…”
Section: Landformsmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…The work of Gunnell et al (2022) and that of Vasile et al (2022) constitute the first inventory and application of 10 Be cosmogenic nuclide dating of RSFs in the Southern Carpathians, respectively. These pioneering studies suggest that Neogene tectonic uplift and climate warming in the Southern Carpathians drove RSF development and that periglacial, fluvial and parafluvial triggers were more important than glacial and paraglacial processes.…”
Section: Spatial Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The main morphological feature of this area is the high degree of fragmentation of the massifs with glacial landforms (sharp ridges and peaks), together with the limited altitudinal development of the landscapes above treeline. Rockwalls have a larger distribution in Făgăraș massif while they are more reduced in size in all the others [58]. Coarse debris deposits occupy large areas in Retezat and Parâng Mountains in comparison to other massifs.…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%