2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2023.118231
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rock-uplift history of the Central Pontides from river-profile inversions and implications for development of the North Anatolian Fault

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(2014) and Racano et al. (2023), where the integral version of the stream power of Equation 2 can be inverted to define the non‐dimensional rock‐uplift rate ( U* ). This corresponds to the slope of the χ ‐plot and allows to infer the rock uplift history of the catchment (Clementucci et al., 2023b; Goren et al., 2014; Racano et al., 2023).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…(2014) and Racano et al. (2023), where the integral version of the stream power of Equation 2 can be inverted to define the non‐dimensional rock‐uplift rate ( U* ). This corresponds to the slope of the χ ‐plot and allows to infer the rock uplift history of the catchment (Clementucci et al., 2023b; Goren et al., 2014; Racano et al., 2023).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2023), where the integral version of the stream power of Equation 2 can be inverted to define the non‐dimensional rock‐uplift rate ( U* ). This corresponds to the slope of the χ ‐plot and allows to infer the rock uplift history of the catchment (Clementucci et al., 2023b; Goren et al., 2014; Racano et al., 2023). χ and U* were then converted to fluvial response time ( τ ) and rock‐uplift rate ( U ) by using estimates of rock erodibility for our study area (Goren et al., 2014): U=KA0m0.25emU $U=K{A}_{0}^{m}\,U\ast $ τ=χKA0m $\tau =\frac{\chi }{{KA}_{0}^{m}}$ …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Geochemical studies indicate that such a magma was originated by melting of a metasomatized and thickened Anatolian subcontinental lithospheric mantle that was destabilized by delamination processes after slab breakoff (e.g., Rabayrol et al., 2019 and references therein). The occurrence of volcanism is considered to be coeval with the development a system of lithospheric scale, dextral (North Anatolian Fault) and sinistral (East Anatolian Fault) strike slip faults that haves accommodated the westward escape of the Anatolian microplate from 13 to 11 Ma (e.g., Ballato et al., 2018; Racano et al., 2023; Şengör et al., 2005). The two faults intersect at the Karliova triple junction (KTJ in Figure 2a; see also Figure S1 in Supporting Information S1) along the western side of the plateau.…”
Section: Geological Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this respect, knickpoints are the landscape features that are typical of detachment-limited systems, since transport-limited ones are characterized by gradual changes in channel gradient (Whipple, 2004;. In general, the simplification n = 1 does not strongly impact on the general results of the river longitudinal profile inversion (Gallen, 2018;Goren et al, 2014;Pazzaglia & Fisher, 2022;Pritchard et al, 2009;Racano et al, 2023;Roberts et al, 2012).…”
Section: River Longitudinal Profile Inversionmentioning
confidence: 99%