2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10064-018-1405-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rock tensile strength prediction using empirical and soft computing approaches

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The obtained results confirmed the superiority of the block punch index over Is 50 in terms of prediction of the BTS. The correlation between TS and Is 50 have been also examined by other studies such as Kahraman and Gunaydin [16], Heidari et al [8], Basu et al [17], Karaman et al [18] and Mahdiyar et al [19]. Sheorey [20] underlined the broadlyacknowledged statement about the correlation of BTS and uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) in rocks, stating that the compressive strength of rock is roughly ten times greater than the BTS of that rock; though, it should be noted that the rock behavior is rather site-specific.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The obtained results confirmed the superiority of the block punch index over Is 50 in terms of prediction of the BTS. The correlation between TS and Is 50 have been also examined by other studies such as Kahraman and Gunaydin [16], Heidari et al [8], Basu et al [17], Karaman et al [18] and Mahdiyar et al [19]. Sheorey [20] underlined the broadlyacknowledged statement about the correlation of BTS and uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) in rocks, stating that the compressive strength of rock is roughly ten times greater than the BTS of that rock; though, it should be noted that the rock behavior is rather site-specific.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…According to their results, the effectiveness of the single compressive strength test in predicting UCS and TS was demonstrated. Mahdiyar et al [19] predicted the TS of rocks using hybrid intelligent models. They used particle swarm optimization (PSO) and imperialist competitive algorithm (ICA) to train the ANN models, and demonstrated the efficiency of their proposed methods in rock TS prediction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, to evaluate the predicted simple regression equations (linear, power, logarithm, and polynomial) and to select the best equation to estimate both UCS and E t based on LRH value, the evaluation was conducted based on statistical performance indices, coefficient of determination (R 2 ), and root mean square error (RMSE), which has been adapted by many researchers (85,86). A strong correlation model can be considered if R 2 equals 1.0 and RMSE are close to zero (29,33).…”
Section: Regression Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To select the best predictive neuro-swarm model, five performance indices including variance account for (VAF), R 2 , mean absolute error (MAE), RMSE and the a20-index have been used and applied. These performance indices have been widely utilized to assess model performance in the previous related works [23,[71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79][80][81]. The computation formulas of VAF, MAE and a20-index are presented as follows:…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%