2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.pss.2018.02.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rock spatial densities on the rims of the Tycho secondary craters in Mare Nectaris

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies have analyzed the cumulative size frequency of boulders around craters or at landing sites (Bart & Melosh, 2010;Basilevsky et al, 2013Basilevsky et al, , 2015Basilevsky et al, , 2018Cintala & McBride, 1995;Krishna & Kumar, 2016;Li et al, 2017Li et al, , 2018Shoemaker et al, 1969), but few have addressed the distribution of boulders as a function of distance from the crater rim, with the exception of Krishna and Kumar (2016), who analyzed boulder distributions around an oblique impact. Our counts therefore improve upon these studies by determining the maximum distance that craters distribute boulders, how boulder size distributions vary as a function of distance, and how these distributions change as a function of crater size and crater age.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous studies have analyzed the cumulative size frequency of boulders around craters or at landing sites (Bart & Melosh, 2010;Basilevsky et al, 2013Basilevsky et al, , 2015Basilevsky et al, , 2018Cintala & McBride, 1995;Krishna & Kumar, 2016;Li et al, 2017Li et al, , 2018Shoemaker et al, 1969), but few have addressed the distribution of boulders as a function of distance from the crater rim, with the exception of Krishna and Kumar (2016), who analyzed boulder distributions around an oblique impact. Our counts therefore improve upon these studies by determining the maximum distance that craters distribute boulders, how boulder size distributions vary as a function of distance, and how these distributions change as a function of crater size and crater age.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High-resolution Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera (LROC) Narrow Angle Camera (NAC) images provide the best image data currently available for conducting quantitative boulder counts at these regions. The LROC NACs have obtained the highest resolution images (~0.5-2 m/pixel) of the lunar surface acquired from orbit to date, enabling the use of boulder distributions for a variety of purposes (e.g., Bandfield et al, 2011;Bart & Melosh, 2010;Basilevsky et al, 2013Basilevsky et al, , 2015Basilevsky et al, , 2018De Rosa et al, 2012;Jawin et al, 2014;Krishna & Kumar, 2016;Lawrence et al, 2013;Li et al, 2017;Watkins et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several fundamental questions on the physical properties of impact craters have been addressed based on these advanced data sets. For example, the formation and degradation mechanisms of radar bright halo and dark halo craters (e.g., Gupta & Ghent 2008;Ghent et al 2010Ghent et al , 2016, the distribution characteristics and age of radar anomalous craters (e.g., Fa & Cai 2013;Eke et al 2014;Fa & Eke 2018), the survival time of rocks and boulders on the lunar surface (e.g., Basilevsky et al 2013Basilevsky et al , 2015Basilevsky et al , 2018, and the dating of individual impact craters (e.g., Bell et al 2012;Ghent et al 2014;Li et al 2018). Furthermore, the temporal evolution of radar circular polarization ratio (CPR) was investigated based on a mare crater database (800 m-5 km; N = 13 657; King et al 2017;Fassett et al 2018a;Nypaver et al 2019Nypaver et al , 2021.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%